I agree. I've heard that ePMP can do both, but honestly I just don't trust having different polarities.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote: > The DSP in the ePMP can do some kind of processing to correct for the 45 > degree offset when you have slant on one end and V+H on the other. I might > not be stating it with the correct technical jargon, but that's the gist of > it. They sell a dual slant sector for the AP with the intent to use it > with V+H integrated SM. > > This is a built in feature of the Atheros chipset, so presumably UBNT > radios can do the same thing. > > That all said...I would try to match them up as just a matter of > principle. > > > > On 12/4/2015 2:07 PM, Joshaven Mailing Lists wrote: > > Your AP & SM should always have the same antenna orientation. I promise > you that you don’t want slant on the AP and not on the CPE. If the signal > is so obstructed that the orientation is screwed up to the point that > unmatched polarization is actually a benefit then there is something > seriously wrong… > > > Sincerely, > Joshaven Potter > MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, UACA > Google Hangouts: yourt...@gmail.com > Cell & SMS: 1-517-607-9370 > supp...@joshaven.com > > > > On Dec 4, 2015, at 1:59 PM, Paul McCall < <pa...@pdmnet.net> > pa...@pdmnet.net> wrote: > > > We are looking at smaller sector sizes for a 5 Ghz ePMP cluster (60 degree > probably), and am considering my options, which might also increase my gain > quite a bit. Using a non-Dual Slant sector such as AM-5AC21-60, would > increase my options. There have been a calling threads on Cambium’s sites > about whether Dual Slant was a big factor at the AP if the SMs aren’t > dual-slant. > > Cambium’s Daniel Sullivan made this comment … The thread was originally > about 2.4 Ghz options, so not sure if it applies exactly to 5 Ghz. > > Paul > > > >
