That would only work if the radio is capable of signal combining or MImo-A and also halves your throughput. You definitely want to match it on both ends
Jon Langeler Michwave Technologies, Inc. > On Dec 4, 2015, at 2:13 PM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The DSP in the ePMP can do some kind of processing to correct for the 45 > degree offset when you have slant on one end and V+H on the other. I might > not be stating it with the correct technical jargon, but that's the gist of > it. They sell a dual slant sector for the AP with the intent to use it with > V+H integrated SM. > > This is a built in feature of the Atheros chipset, so presumably UBNT radios > can do the same thing. > > That all said...I would try to match them up as just a matter of principle. > > > >> On 12/4/2015 2:07 PM, Joshaven Mailing Lists wrote: >> Your AP & SM should always have the same antenna orientation. I promise you >> that you don’t want slant on the AP and not on the CPE. If the signal is so >> obstructed that the orientation is screwed up to the point that unmatched >> polarization is actually a benefit then there is something seriously wrong… >> >> >> Sincerely, >> Joshaven Potter >> MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, UACA >> Google Hangouts: yourt...@gmail.com >> Cell & SMS: 1-517-607-9370 >> supp...@joshaven.com >> >> >> >>> On Dec 4, 2015, at 1:59 PM, Paul McCall <pa...@pdmnet.net> wrote: >>> >>> >>> We are looking at smaller sector sizes for a 5 Ghz ePMP cluster (60 degree >>> probably), and am considering my options, which might also increase my gain >>> quite a bit. Using a non-Dual Slant sector such as AM-5AC21-60, would >>> increase my options. There have been a calling threads on Cambium’s sites >>> about whether Dual Slant was a big factor at the AP if the SMs aren’t >>> dual-slant. >>> >>> Cambium’s Daniel Sullivan made this comment … The thread was originally >>> about 2.4 Ghz options, so not sure if it applies exactly to 5 Ghz. >>> >>> Paul >
