My goal in the next 12-18 months is to completely have my FSK network changed over to PMP450. I'm halfway there now. But there still are some AP's on FSK that are micro-pops today that are not overloaded. All of those have under 10 subs.
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 11:25 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree. Didn't mean it's totally dead. Far from it. We're still moving it > out to smaller sites. I do see it completely gone from our network in ~3 > years though. Still, 3 years is a LONG time. So the point I was trying to > make is that the new features in 13.2-13.4 were definitely needed. Luckily > they listened. They seem to be doing that a lot lately which is weird. :) > > On 12/11/2015 10:11 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > > Not enough bandwidth for most of us? Sure. For any application what so > ever? No way! > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 11:02 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> wrote: > >> FSK wasn't supposed to get beyond 13.1.x. I think we all complained >> enough about not getting some of the new goodies that they gave in and >> decided on one last hurrah. Sector SA and config export/import is very >> useful, even now that PMP/PTP100 is EOL. It will live on in the used market >> for years. It's reliable, but it's just not enough bandwidth anymore. >> >> On 12/11/2015 9:40 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: >> >> Right. And Neptune was the end of the road for the Voyager probes. >> >> >> *From:* George Skorup <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Friday, December 11, 2015 9:17 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Graph 450 Airtime Utilization >> >> No, FSK did not get frame utilization in 13.4. I believe Matt or Aaron >> said the hardware won't support it. And 13.4.1 is the end of the road for >> PMP100. >> >> On 12/11/2015 8:32 PM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote: >> >> Does this new OID feature work on old PMP100 serires? >> >> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 2:55 PM, George Skorup < <[email protected]> >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> It was there in 2.4.something and my graphs broke after going to 2.5 and >>> 2.5.1. Not sure about 2.5.2 yet. I thought they moved some OIDs back around >>> that got changed for some reason. >>> >>> And it is/was also raw values, not percents yet, AFAIK. >>> >>> On 12/11/2015 1:52 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: >>> >>> Not yet but soon (TM) >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Adam Moffett < <[email protected]> >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Is there a similar OID for the ePMP? >>>> >>>> >>>> On 12/11/2015 2:42 PM, Steve Utick wrote: >>>> >>>> Frame Utilization downlink: .1.3.6.1.4.1.161.19.3.1.12.1.1.0 >>>> Frame Utilization uplink: .1.3.6.1.4.1.161.19.3.1.12.1.2.0 >>>> >>>> We are graphing it here, requires 14.1.x software before the data is >>>> there though. Works great, quick way to tell how full your A/P's are, >>>> that's for sure. REALLY turns up the effect of crappy installs. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Matt < <[email protected]> >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> If I recall there is a way to graph on 450 the total airtime >>>>> utilization? What is the SNMP string to do that? Anyone doing it and >>>>> if so how well does it work? >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > >
