But interestingly, on Windows 10 I get Microsoft Windows [Version
10.0.10586]

but there's no Windows 9 no matter what names or numbers you use.

On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Bill Prince <[email protected]> wrote:

> I've got a Windows 8.1 machine, and when I type "ver" at the CLI, I get:
>
> Microsoft Windows [Version 6.3.9600]
>
>
> bp
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>
>
> On 12/12/2015 9:15 AM, Mathew Howard wrote:
>
> Well, if you want to be picky, 4 (NT) was 4, and 2000 was 5 and ME was...
> an abomination that should've never existed.
>
> But who says you have to start at 1 anyway?
>
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Bill Prince <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> 4 was 98; 5 was ME, 6 was Vista.
>>
>> But that's software. We're talking hardware versions.
>>
>> bp
>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>
>>
>> On 12/12/2015 8:09 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>>
>> But not 4, 5, 6...
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>> On Dec 12, 2015 11:07 AM, "Bill Prince" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> But there was a Windows 1 and 2.
>>>
>>> bp
>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/12/2015 8:04 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>>>
>>> There wasn't a Windows 94, 93, 92, etc...
>>>
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>
>>> On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Bill Prince < <[email protected]>
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> And if there was a P7, there surely must have been P6, P5, P4, P3, P2,
>>>> and P1...
>>>>
>>>> bp
>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 12/11/2015 8:10 PM, George Skorup wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I think the first set of radios we bought were P8 5700BHs running
>>>> v3.something in early 2003. Obviously there was P7 before that. Maybe late
>>>> '02?
>>>>
>>>> And I believe Charles Wu put up those P8s, BTW. :) Pretty sure I still
>>>> have those stashed in the cabinet, too.
>>>>
>>>> On 12/11/2015 9:58 PM, Adam Moffett wrote:
>>>>
>>>> When did Canopy hit the shelves?  2003?  Is there a PMP product out
>>>> there with a longer lifespan?  Even with better options on the market I
>>>> know some WISPs have no plans to drop it completely because you still can't
>>>> beat it for long range reliability.
>>>>
>>>> Right.  And Neptune was the end of the road for the Voyager probes.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* George Skorup <[email protected]>
>>>> *Sent:* Friday, December 11, 2015 9:17 PM
>>>> *To:* <[email protected]>[email protected]
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Graph 450 Airtime Utilization
>>>>
>>>> No, FSK did not get frame utilization in 13.4. I believe Matt or Aaron
>>>> said the hardware won't support it. And 13.4.1 is the end of the road for
>>>> PMP100.
>>>>
>>>> On 12/11/2015 8:32 PM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Does this new OID feature work on old PMP100 serires?
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 2:55 PM, George Skorup < <[email protected]>
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It was there in 2.4.something and my graphs broke after going to 2.5
>>>>> and 2.5.1. Not sure about 2.5.2 yet. I thought they moved some OIDs back
>>>>> around that got changed for some reason.
>>>>>
>>>>> And it is/was also raw values, not percents yet, AFAIK.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/11/2015 1:52 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Not yet but soon (TM)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Adam Moffett < <[email protected]>
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Is there a similar OID for the ePMP?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/11/2015 2:42 PM, Steve Utick wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Frame Utilization downlink:  .1.3.6.1.4.1.161.19.3.1.12.1.1.0
>>>>>> Frame Utilization uplink: .1.3.6.1.4.1.161.19.3.1.12.1.2.0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We are graphing it here, requires 14.1.x software before the data is
>>>>>> there though.   Works great, quick way to tell how full your A/P's are,
>>>>>> that's for sure.   REALLY turns up the effect of crappy installs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Matt <
>>>>>> <[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If I recall there is a way to graph on 450 the total airtime
>>>>>>> utilization?  What is the SNMP string to do that?  Anyone doing it
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> if so how well does it work?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to