Well, if you want to be picky, 4 (NT) was 4, and 2000 was 5 and ME was... an abomination that should've never existed.
But who says you have to start at 1 anyway? On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Bill Prince <[email protected]> wrote: > 4 was 98; 5 was ME, 6 was Vista. > > But that's software. We're talking hardware versions. > > bp > <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > > > On 12/12/2015 8:09 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: > > But not 4, 5, 6... > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On Dec 12, 2015 11:07 AM, "Bill Prince" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> But there was a Windows 1 and 2. >> >> bp >> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >> >> >> On 12/12/2015 8:04 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: >> >> There wasn't a Windows 94, 93, 92, etc... >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Bill Prince < <[email protected]> >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> And if there was a P7, there surely must have been P6, P5, P4, P3, P2, >>> and P1... >>> >>> bp >>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>> >>> >>> On 12/11/2015 8:10 PM, George Skorup wrote: >>> >>> I think the first set of radios we bought were P8 5700BHs running >>> v3.something in early 2003. Obviously there was P7 before that. Maybe late >>> '02? >>> >>> And I believe Charles Wu put up those P8s, BTW. :) Pretty sure I still >>> have those stashed in the cabinet, too. >>> >>> On 12/11/2015 9:58 PM, Adam Moffett wrote: >>> >>> When did Canopy hit the shelves? 2003? Is there a PMP product out >>> there with a longer lifespan? Even with better options on the market I >>> know some WISPs have no plans to drop it completely because you still can't >>> beat it for long range reliability. >>> >>> Right. And Neptune was the end of the road for the Voyager probes. >>> >>> >>> *From:* George Skorup <[email protected]> >>> *Sent:* Friday, December 11, 2015 9:17 PM >>> *To:* <[email protected]>[email protected] >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Graph 450 Airtime Utilization >>> >>> No, FSK did not get frame utilization in 13.4. I believe Matt or Aaron >>> said the hardware won't support it. And 13.4.1 is the end of the road for >>> PMP100. >>> >>> On 12/11/2015 8:32 PM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote: >>> >>> Does this new OID feature work on old PMP100 serires? >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 2:55 PM, George Skorup < <[email protected]> >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> It was there in 2.4.something and my graphs broke after going to 2.5 >>>> and 2.5.1. Not sure about 2.5.2 yet. I thought they moved some OIDs back >>>> around that got changed for some reason. >>>> >>>> And it is/was also raw values, not percents yet, AFAIK. >>>> >>>> On 12/11/2015 1:52 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: >>>> >>>> Not yet but soon (TM) >>>> >>>> >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> >>>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Adam Moffett < <[email protected]> >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Is there a similar OID for the ePMP? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 12/11/2015 2:42 PM, Steve Utick wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Frame Utilization downlink: .1.3.6.1.4.1.161.19.3.1.12.1.1.0 >>>>> Frame Utilization uplink: .1.3.6.1.4.1.161.19.3.1.12.1.2.0 >>>>> >>>>> We are graphing it here, requires 14.1.x software before the data is >>>>> there though. Works great, quick way to tell how full your A/P's are, >>>>> that's for sure. REALLY turns up the effect of crappy installs. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Matt < <[email protected]> >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> If I recall there is a way to graph on 450 the total airtime >>>>>> utilization? What is the SNMP string to do that? Anyone doing it and >>>>>> if so how well does it work? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >
