Are you sure its a clean 40 mhz channel? Sounds like interference to me... Maybe the distance is too great for the 40mhz band and it freaking out the radios.
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: > Put the firmware on it anyway IMO. > > Is the slave side losing uptime or just losing association? Other gear on > the tower staying powered? > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On Jan 14, 2016 12:49 PM, "George Skorup" <geo...@cbcast.com> wrote: > >> I've had this 13.7 mile link running v2.5, 5.1 band, 20MHz, non-GPS >> radios for 110 days without any issues. I switched the slave scan to >> include 40MHz and then moved the master to 40MHz width the other day. Since >> then it appears the slave has been rebooting. However this morning, the >> link wasn't passing traffic for over two hours, then it magically fixed >> itself. An hour later and it rebooted. I remember reading some stuff, >> possibly release notes, that the ePTP slave could reboot under heavy >> interference. This link is on a very clean channel though. About -58 RSSI >> and it maintains MCS 15 both directions nearly all the time. >> >> So I don't have a clue. Ran perfect on 20MHz channel bandwidth. Just >> needed a little more throughput out of it, thus 40MHz. I just upgraded both >> ends to v2.6, so I hope that fixes it. >> >> And no, these radios are not CE+ MACs. >> > -- -- *Sam Lambie* Taosnet Wireless Tech. 575-758-7598 Office www.Taosnet.com <http://www.newmex.com>
