Might make sense to spend some money with Steve or Jon to get the ducks lined up legally.
Jeff Broadwick ConVergence Technologies, Inc. 312-205-2519 Office 574-220-7826 Cell jbroadw...@converge-tech.com > On Jan 15, 2016, at 10:50 AM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Depending on how many 3.65 backhauls there are (and what they are), it might > be more practical to just replace them with something else rather than trying > to deal with transferring the license. > >> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 9:44 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm >> <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >> we have an 11ghz license that got fubared and ended up in the name of our >> purchasing partner, we technically dont own it, it will cost around 800 >> dollars to correct it. we are ok because the partner is part of the umbrella >> of companies, so long as we dont close that one down ever. Hopefully the 200 >> dollar license doesnt cost 800 to transfer especially if there is more than >> one link >> >>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Jeff Broadwick - Lists <jeffl...@att.net> >>> wrote: >>> Can't you just lease the license to the other entity? >>> >>> Jeff Broadwick >>> ConVergence Technologies, Inc. >>> 312-205-2519 Office >>> 574-220-7826 Cell >>> jbroadw...@converge-tech.com >>> >>>> On Jan 15, 2016, at 12:11 AM, Christopher Gray >>>> <cg...@graytechsoftware.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> No, they're selling off some residential networks, but the larger business >>>> will continue to exist. >>>> >>>> I'll dig into the name change possibilities tomorrow. >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:52 PM, Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuh...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Did you acquire the corporate entity that originally created and holds >>>>> the licenses? If so, keep them as they are... >>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Christopher Gray >>>>>> <cg...@graytechsoftware.com> wrote: >>>>>> If I take over a network that has some 3.65 backhauls, can I transfer >>>>>> the 3.65 license, or will I need to replace those links with something >>>>>> else? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks - Chris >> >> >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as >> part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >
