I can share with you that @ 60Ghz, approx 2-5ft and or 5-10deg angular separation will allow you to reuse the channel. In addition, the signal tends to self attenuate between 800m-2000m roughly, Chuck is absolutely correct from a practical perspective.
Regards. Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet & Telecom 7266 SW 48 Street Miami, FL 33155 Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net > From: "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com> > To: af@afmug.com > Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2016 12:35:55 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] How much space in 70 ghz? > From a practical point of view, I cannot see you interfering or being detected > at these frequencies unless you were on the same rooftop with other systems. > From: Mark Radabaugh > Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2016 7:33 AM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] How much space in 70 ghz? > This is from Steve Coran on the WISPA FCC Committee list regarding FCC > proposals > for high frequency spectrum. > Based on the very limited feedback we have had from members on this proposal > WISPA in NOT planning on making a filing in this proceeding. If there is WISP > interest in this spectrum and you think we should file there is still a > (short) > amount of time to do so. > Let me know. > Mark (with the FCC Chair hat on). > I’ll be meeting with Google, Microsoft and public interest groups at 2 PM EST > on > Friday to discuss positions on the Spectrum Frontiers NPRM. Michael Calabrese > will send around an invite so you can join if you would like. > Here is a link to the NPRM: > https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-15-138A1.pdf . I’d > appreciate > any insight you may have in advance of the meeting, especially as relates to > protection of incumbents (i.e., our members that have LMDS licenses), “use it > or share it,” future licensing (e.g., SAS-type approach, service requirements, > geographic areas), and unlicensed use 64-71 GHz as well as “use it or share > it” > and/or SAS-type approach in licensed bands). If you think it would be > productive, the three of us can meet by phone before the Friday meeting. We > also should discuss at the FCC Committee next Tuesday. > Comments are due January 26. Thanks. > Please note the mailing and shipping address change below: > Mark Radabaugh > Amplex > 22690 Pemberville Rd > Luckey, OH 43443 > 419-837-5015 x1021 > m...@amplex.net >> On Jan 16, 2016, at 4:40 PM, Carl Peterson < cpeter...@portnetworks.com > >> wrote: >> Hmm, looking at the spec sheet, the 2200 does 2g @ 500 so you could use up >> to 8 >> http://www.siklu.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/EH2200F-Data-SheetFX-web.pdf >> On Jan 16, 2016, at 3:53 PM, Gino Villarini < ginovi...@gmail.com > wrote: >>> any way to squeeze 5? trying 10G >>> On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Carl Peterson < cpeter...@portnetworks.com >>> > >>> wrote: >>>> 8 Siklus at a gig FD by my math. With the 2200 I would guess 4 at 2G FD >>>> each. >>>> > On Jan 16, 2016, at 11:02 AM, Gino Villarini < ginovi...@gmail.com > >>>> > wrote: >>>> > Wondering how many PTP links could be aggregated on the same path
