Just crank it up to 28-30v and everything will be happy... or use a
Force110 PTP instead and just run the whole works on 48v.

On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 3:24 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I just read forrests breakdown, very interesting on the drop in voltage.
> We also use the GIGEAPC SS I wonder if there is any voltage drop across
> those as well
>
>
> In my case above, Im better off just independently powering the SM
> backhaul since it will be going away in the future anyway.
>
> Our other packetflux epmp sync deployment we had to just use internal sync
> since it kept dropping pulses from the syncinjector, but I like the
> independent port controls anyhow
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Ain't no sync on those bruh
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>>
>>> One of deese...
>>>
>>> http://www.mccowntech.com/din-rail-mount-for-surge-suppressors-protectors/
>>> An tree of deese...
>>>
>>> http://www.mccowntech.com/rack-mount-gige-poe-apc-surge-suppressor-power-inserter-protector/
>>>
>>> Use any voltage you want on each circuit.
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> *From: *"That One Guy /sarcasm" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
>>> *To: *af@afmug.com
>>> *Sent: *Monday, February 1, 2016 3:02:44 PM
>>> *Subject: *[AFMUG] Packetflux gigabit syncinjector force connectorized
>>> epmp 24        V
>>>
>>> I have a site we will initially feed with an epmp force 110
>>> (connectorized epmp) and serve two EPMPgps APs from it. To conserver space,
>>> I want to just run all three radios off a gigabit syncinjector, but the
>>> epmp connectorized is limited to 30 v.
>>> Is there any issue running the EPMP gps APs on 24 volts?
>>>
>>> --
>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
>>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>

Reply via email to