This will be our main monkeys first solo build, he's supposed to be taking primary on outside plant and some planning, trying to keep thing limited to familiar stock. If it weren't for the fact we had an installer try to take an ap out for an install the other day I'd just use a full ap for the subscriber backhaul. On Feb 2, 2016 6:56 AM, "[email protected]" < [email protected]> wrote:
> Why not use the the ePMP PtP/AP Lite for an SM? It's not much more than a > regular SM and it > can be powered the same as the APs. > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote: > >> If Steve is wondering: The a lot of Meanwell PSU's have a screw to >> adjust the output voltage. Usually it's to match the float voltage of >> batteries, but if you don't have batteries you can crank it up all the way. >> >> >> >> On 2/1/2016 4:29 PM, Josh Baird wrote: >> >> We have gone back to sites and cranked the PSU's feeding the >> SyncInjectors up to ~30V. We had numerous power and sync problems in the >> cold weather when our PSU's were outputting ~25-26V (there was ~150ft of >> cable to the radio as well). We'll be rolling 48V at all future sites. >> >> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Brandon Yuchasz <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I have run all mine at 24 volts all winter without issue. I did not have >>> any of the cold susceptible mac addresses however. My only concern is if >>> had a long power outage and batteries died perhaps the epmp would have >>> powered up the heaters and never got to boot. It did not happen so it’s >>> simply a theory on what could still go wrong for me this winter. I do plan >>> to step those packetflux units up to 29.5v soon as possible. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Brandon Yuchasz >>> >>> GogebicRange.net >>> >>> <http://www.gogebicrange.net/>www.gogebicrange.net >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Mike Hammett >>> *Sent:* Monday, February 01, 2016 3:04 PM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Packetflux gigabit syncinjector force >>> connectorized epmp 24 V >>> >>> >>> >>> Running them at 24v is what some of the commotion has been about lately. >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> >>> >>> >>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> *From: *"That One Guy /sarcasm" < <[email protected]> >>> [email protected]> >>> *To: *[email protected] >>> *Sent: *Monday, February 1, 2016 3:02:44 PM >>> *Subject: *[AFMUG] Packetflux gigabit syncinjector force connectorized >>> epmp 24 V >>> >>> I have a site we will initially feed with an epmp force 110 >>> (connectorized epmp) and serve two EPMPgps APs from it. To conserver space, >>> I want to just run all three radios off a gigabit syncinjector, but the >>> epmp connectorized is limited to 30 v. >>> >>> Is there any issue running the EPMP gps APs on 24 volts? >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >
