Give them the dick response that its just math On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was thinking about this during my drive to work today, and the > towercoverage.com thread just reminded me. > > Is there a realistic way to do drive testing for fixed wireless? > > I've plotted coverage using a 22' subscriber height, and I can't drive > around with a 22' high mast (vehicles and loads have a 13'6" height limit > in NY State). So rather than collecting data as I drive --which would be > relatively painless-- I'd have to stop, deploy a mast, record coord and > reading, un-deploy mast, move to next test point, repeat. > > I think I could set a drone to a 22' flight ceiling. I'd still have to > drive the drone to different places because it will only work within range > of the controller. > > Or maybe forget about drive testing.....is there a realistic way to > validate your coverage map other than attempting installations and seeing > which ones work? > > If you're wondering why, I've been asked by some officials "how do you > validate this coverage projection?" All I've really got is that we attempt > installs and they usually work where they're supposed to. > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
