GOING to expect? Have you not been dealing with customers' 802.11b Linksys routers not pulling 25 meg on their Windows 98 PC?
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: > Kind of scary when you realize SATA-3.0 transfer rate is 6 Gbps, SAS-3 is > 12 Gbps, SATA-3.2 is 16 Gbps. And people are going to expect they can run > a speedtest from their iPad or Android with a low power CPU, on their dodgy > WiFi, and complain if they don't get the advertised Internet speed. > > > -----Original Message----- From: Nate Burke > Sent: Friday, February 05, 2016 10:55 AM > > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 100Gbps > > I have mixed feelings on it, I think that if you're pushing the > envelope, then you should pay for it. But as the market meets demand, > prices should come down. Remember back when 10/100 switches were > $1000? Now, you can get a 24 Port 1G switch with 10G uplinks for, what, > $400? In another 10 years, 100G will probably be the same. Pickup a 24 > Port 100G switch with 1TB uplinks for $200. > > Although at the same time, Throwing more Bandwidth at the problem just > makes for sloppier code. Average webpage loads are now, what 5-6mb, for > really no more content. Things used to be efficient, as it was the > programs responsibility for performance, Now it's the clients > responsibility if things are slow (upgrade your PC, upgrade your internet) > > https://xkcd.com/1605/ > > On 2/5/2016 10:34 AM, Adam Moffett wrote: > >> You tell them and they'll tell you how your capital expenses don't matter. >> In 1995 they decided that internet should be free and they'll never stop >> believing it. >> >> On 2/5/2016 10:04 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote: >> >>> I cringe when people portray multi gigabit bandwidth as costing pennies, >>> as if the only cost is the fiber. Yeah, until you have to route those >>> packets, rather than just transporting a beam of light. >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- From: Faisal Imtiaz >>> Sent: Friday, February 05, 2016 8:57 AM >>> To: af@afmug.com >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 100Gbps >>> >>> It's not un-common to do 100Gpbs as follows:- >>> Bonding 10x 10G circuits >>> Bonding a combination of 40G circuits. >>> >>> providing 100G switched transport is easy. >>> Having a router, to do 100G transport is not, >>> Expect to pay approx $100k for a router (loaded ready to go, on the >>> 2ndary markets) >>> >>> Regards. >>> >>> Faisal Imtiaz >>> Snappy Internet & Telecom >>> 7266 SW 48 Street >>> Miami, FL 33155 >>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 >>> >>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> >>>> From: "Sterling Jacobson" <sterl...@avative.net> >>>> To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> >>>> Sent: Friday, February 5, 2016 1:01:09 AM >>>> Subject: [AFMUG] 100Gbps >>>> >>> >>> So... Let's just say, for a minute, that I could sell Adobe a 100Gbps >>>> line. >>>> >>>> What would that be priced at? >>>> >>>> I think I can do it technically with a pair of fiber I can get end to >>>> end. >>>> >>>> Are their LD optics at 100Gbps yet? >>>> >>>> Or are we still talking dense wave multiplexing? >>>> >>> >>> >>> > >
