That's correct, as I understood it. On Tuesday, February 23, 2016, Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us> wrote:
> OOBE rules have/are being modified so as to meet the intended DoD > requirements but not hamstring the manufacturers with expensive filters > etc. I believe they pushed back some or all of the implementation for a > year. there was an explanation at last years wispapalooza on the technical > details and i know steve coran posted some filings etc. to the list a while > back. I think the FCC chose the UBNT method over the WISPA/JAB method. > > don't quote me on this tho...i might have just been drunk in vegas and > dreamed all this up lol. > > -Sean > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Matt <matt.mailingli...@gmail.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','matt.mailingli...@gmail.com');>> wrote: > >> Will the "next generation PMP 450 SM" have the same throughput and >> range as the current standard PMP450 SM with a reflector dish in 5.8 >> ghz band? Just concerned the new OOBE rules might reduce usefulness >> of 5 ghz band for longer range PtmP and PTP? I am guessing they will >> have some added filtering to meet the OOBE rules and just hoping this >> does not reduce range terribly? 24 volt or 48 volt POE? It would be >> nice if they worked on either voltage to make swap outs easier. Will >> also slightly reduce cost of swapping power supplies. >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 8:36 AM, Matt Mangriotis >> <matt.mangrio...@cambiumnetworks.com >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','matt.mangrio...@cambiumnetworks.com');>> >> wrote: >> > YES! >> > >> > We are undertaking this project and working toward a next generation >> PMP 450 >> > SM that will cover the entire 5 GHz band (from 4.9-5.9 GHz), and be less >> > expensive than the 450i SM. >> > >> > At this point, I can’t comment on much surrounding the launch, as we’ve >> only >> > recently embarked down this path. >> > >> > Matt >> > >> > >> > >> > From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af-boun...@afmug.com');>] On Behalf Of Sam >> Lambie >> > Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2016 8:59 PM >> > To: af@afmug.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af@afmug.com');> >> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450i 5.1 and 5.2 non overlapping channels? >> > >> > >> > >> > Thank you Matt. I appreciate the info. >> > >> > Are there any plans on creating 1 450 SM that can handle all 4 >> frequencies? >> > >> > That would be super.... >> > >> > >> > >> > On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 3:30 PM, George Skorup <geo...@cbcast.com >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','geo...@cbcast.com');>> wrote: >> > >> > No, the regular 450 is hardware limited to 5470-5900. >> > >> > >> > >> > On 2/20/2016 3:55 PM, Jeff Broadwick - Lists wrote: >> > >> > Will the 450 CPE work in 5.2? >> > >> > Jeff Broadwick >> > >> > ConVergence Technologies, Inc. >> > >> > 312-205-2519 Office >> > >> > 574-220-7826 Cell >> > >> > jbroadw...@converge-tech.com >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jbroadw...@converge-tech.com');> >> > >> > >> > On Feb 20, 2016, at 2:45 PM, Tushar Patel <tpa...@ecpi.com >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','tpa...@ecpi.com');>> wrote: >> > >> > Matt, >> > >> > >> > >> > To take advantage don't we need cheaper CPE? >> > >> > Tushar >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Feb 20, 2016, at 12:43 PM, Matt Mangriotis >> > <matt.mangrio...@cambiumnetworks.com >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','matt.mangrio...@cambiumnetworks.com');>> >> wrote: >> > >> > Didn’t see anyone answer you on this Sam. >> > >> > >> > >> > 5.1 GHz (UNII-1) is 100 MHz (5150-5250 MHz), and is not DFS controlled, >> and >> > follows similar rules to 5.8 GHz. This band is available in R14.1.1. >> > >> > >> > >> > 5.2 GHz (UNII-2) is also 100 MHz (5250-5350 MHz), but is a bit less >> useful >> > in that the max EIRP allowed is 30 dBm and it’s subject to DFS radar >> > detection mechanisms. >> > >> > >> > >> > Additional info: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U-NII >> > >> > >> > >> > Taking advantage of these bands, however, can prove hugely useful and >> > several of our customers are getting equipment deployed and working >> soon. >> > >> > >> > >> > (Note: 5.2 and 5.4 will be supported in the R14.1.2 beta release that >> will >> > be out very soon). >> > >> > >> > >> > Matt >> > >> > >> > >> > From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af-boun...@afmug.com');>] On Behalf Of Sam >> Lambie >> > Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 4:54 PM >> > To: af@afmug.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af@afmug.com');> >> > Subject: [AFMUG] 450i 5.1 and 5.2 non overlapping channels? >> > >> > >> > >> > Is there any documentation or list knowledge on how big each frequency >> is? >> > >> > Just wondering if it is worth it to go to the 450i and the ridiculously >> > expensive SM's. >> > >> > We are running out of spectrum in 5.4 and 5.8 though. >> > >> > >> > -- >> > >> > -- >> > Sam Lambie >> > Taosnet Wireless Tech. >> > 575-758-7598 Office >> > www.Taosnet.com >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > >> > -- >> > Sam Lambie >> > Taosnet Wireless Tech. >> > 575-758-7598 Office >> > www.Taosnet.com >> > > -- Regards, Chuck
