Yeah, all the ePMP's except for the old integrated 5ghz and the non-GPS connectorized 5ghz/Force110 will work with either PoE polarity.
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 9:20 AM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > Same customer replies with something I didn’t know: > > > > Yes, the newer Cambium ePMP Force 180 ship standard with a 1Gbps PoE and > are 1Gbps Ethernet interfaces. We currently have the 444S-REV-A2 surge > suppressors. > > Note that the Force 180 is backward compatible with the older Canopy PoE > and Canopy 600SS surge suppressors (in fact even the first generation of > the Canopy surge suppressors appear to work so far). As far as I am > aware from their current docs (webinars), the newer ePMP Force 180 will > 'autosense' which PoE is being used and work. Therefore, this allows for > both the legacy PoE adapters and (competitors as well) to work on the > devices without having to worry about that reverse pin-out story or power. > > I haven't attempted to test the 444SS surge with the 100Mbps PoE > adapters as yet. Maybe I will try that and give you my results. > > > *From:* Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> > *Sent:* Thursday, February 25, 2016 7:10 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] epmp 1000 poe > > > AP is gig. Force 180 is the new integrated sideways radio also gig. > > Force 110 isn't gig. > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On Feb 25, 2016 9:06 AM, "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > >> I had this in my inbox this morning: >> >> Hi; >> >> We tried to install the 444SS-SMT surge suppressor to be used with the >> Cambium Networks ePMP 1000 series SMs (ePMP Force 180) and the SM would >> not come on and/or was accessible via IP. >> >> Is the 444SS-SMT surge suppressor compatible with the 1000 series? If >> so, is there something else that we should be doing in order to get it >> working? >> >> Isn’t the ePMP 1000 etc all GigE configuration? >> >> >> >