North Warning System and DEW line as well, though some of those came later.
On Mar 1, 2016 3:16 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote:

> White Alice
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Alice_Communications_System
>
> There was one in Homer, AK I went poking around in a year or two ago :)
>
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > With very early post-ww2 radar installations in Alaska guys would go out
> and
> > stand in front of the dish to get warm....
> >
> > On Mar 1, 2016 2:21 PM, "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> A quick and dirty method is whether or not you can feel warmth or heat.
> >> If so you may be getting damaged.  I feels like a heat lamp.  If you
> feel
> >> any warmth from the antennas come back down.
> >>
> >> It isn’t an emergency your are going to die go to the ER type of thing,
> >> but certain parts of your body are more susceptible to biological
> heating
> >> than others.  I still cannot find backup for this, but I was told many
> years
> >> ago that the lens of your eye is one of the most susceptible organs.
> >>
> >> As I recall the story, WWII Sailors would get warm in front of radar
> >> antennas while standing watch.  They later developed cataracts.
> >>
> >> From: Christopher Gray
> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 1:02 PM
> >> To: af@afmug.com
> >> Subject: [AFMUG] Safe or Not - Working Near Mobile Phone Systems
> >>
> >> I'm hoping to do some work in a steeple that has cell phone equipment. I
> >> understand there are currently 6 sectors, and will soon be 9 sectors for
> >> mobile phone service located behind the louvers.
> >>
> >> I would like to assess which work locations require disabling the mobile
> >> system (if any), and if there are specific exposure times associated
> with
> >> such work locations.
> >>
> >> 1 - Level above existing installation.
> >> 2 - Same level as mobile system, but behind sectors.
> >> 3 - In front of sectors, outside the structure.
> >>
> >> I appreciate any help or guidance. Thank you - Chris
>

Reply via email to