I don't do racks at many locations. Certainly not looking forward to it in the future.
I have an 8 port that does my APs - that's NSEW in two bands. I don't see us ever being able to utilize all of that bandwidth in this area. 12 would include my backhauls, but I don't care about sync'ing them. Sure would be nice to have one POE that does all my Ubnt and Epmp radios after it gets 24v, though. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) < li...@packetflux.com> wrote: > So, I have in the fairly immediate future the new "universal" 4 port > injector (in the same form factor as the existing syncinjectors).... > > And the rackmount unit is progressing well, so that's coming as well - up > to 16 or 18 ports per 1U > > And then we have the item the question is about. > > I intended to build a 12 port unit in a double height din rail mountable > enclosure. If you think about gluing two syncinjectors on top of each > other and having 12 ports instead of 8 in that same space - that's what I'm > talking about. > > I'm wondering how many people would use this last product. My thought > would be that once you get to more than a handful of radios at a site, > you're probably going to end up wanting the rackmount solution.... > > Using two syncinjectors will get you to 8 radios in the same space as this > proposed device, at 2/3 of the cost of the proposed device. > > How many of you would be using more than 8 radios at a site that you > wouldn't just move to a rackmount unit? > > -- > *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.* > Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602 > forre...@imach.com | http://www.packetflux.com > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian> <http://facebook.com/packetflux> > <http://twitter.com/@packetflux> > >
