um Rory, the republican congress in it's infinite wisdom turned down secretary clinton's budget request to increase security for the embassies and especially these smaller consulates...instead they decreased the budget by $296 million and lo and behold one was attacked and people died! so where is the outrage for that?!?!?
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/sep/27/benghazi-attack-followed-deep-cuts-in-state-depart/?page=all just sayin' -Sean she's a witch! https://youtu.be/zrzMhU_4m-g?t=23s On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Rory Conaway <[email protected]> wrote: > This is an old story and only partially true. The problem is the > Republican base wants an explanation for why these Americans died and why > nobody in the administration and the State Department did their job before > and during, and then lied afterwards. Some Republicans have that opinion. > The rest of us and the majority of Republicans on that committee want the > truth. BTW, every wonder why nobody was able to find most of the witnesses > that were there for 2 years? > > > > Rory > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Sean Heskett > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 23, 2016 11:26 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] [political] [utah] > > > > Hey Rory, > > > > > > Another Republican admits: Benghazi panel is political > > > > > http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/another-republican-admits-benghazi-panel-political > > > > just sayin' > > > > ok here's fox news finally admitting to it also...since you probably don't > like rachel meadow and msnbc > > > > > http://mediamatters.org/research/2015/10/16/fox-news-finally-concedes-benghazi-committee-is/206217 > > > > -sean > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Rory Conaway <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I've been called worse than dumb so I can live with that. What do you > call someone who supports a candidate under investigation for obvious > criminal activity, probably traitorous, and the fact that she became > incredibly rich selling influence in the State Department? Nothing > personal but dumb doesn't even come close, but definitely intellectual > dishonest. > > Rory > > -----Original Message----- > From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bill Prince > Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 9:48 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [political] [utah] > > Fascinating. Trump actually can offend some people. Probably the smarter > ones... > > bp > <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > > On 3/23/2016 7:10 AM, Chuck McCown wrote: > > This is the outcome I would have expected. > > -----Original Message----- From: Josh Reynolds Sent: Tuesday, March > > 22, 2016 11:45 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [AFMUG] [political] [utah] > > > Chuck, > > > > So I'm watching the polling right now.. it's *very* early, only 3% (R) > > and 11% (D) ballots counted. > > [R] So far It's Cruz 58.8%, Kasich 22.0%, Trump 19.2%. > > [D] So far it's Sanders 74.8%, Clinton 24.1%. > > > > Since you're over there in beautiful Utah, I'm interested in hearing > > your (and others) thoughts on this so far. > > >
