I've been called worse than dumb so I can live with that. What do you call someone who supports a candidate under investigation for obvious criminal activity, probably traitorous, and the fact that she became incredibly rich selling influence in the State Department? Nothing personal but dumb doesn't even come close, but definitely intellectual dishonest.
Rory -----Original Message----- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Bill Prince Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 9:48 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [political] [utah] Fascinating. Trump actually can offend some people. Probably the smarter ones... bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 3/23/2016 7:10 AM, Chuck McCown wrote: > This is the outcome I would have expected. > -----Original Message----- From: Josh Reynolds Sent: Tuesday, March > 22, 2016 11:45 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] [political] [utah] > Chuck, > > So I'm watching the polling right now.. it's *very* early, only 3% (R) > and 11% (D) ballots counted. > [R] So far It's Cruz 58.8%, Kasich 22.0%, Trump 19.2%. > [D] So far it's Sanders 74.8%, Clinton 24.1%. > > Since you're over there in beautiful Utah, I'm interested in hearing > your (and others) thoughts on this so far.
