There are 20+ emails that were clearly classified so high, some of the people investigating this can’t even see them, and that was way before they were sent. In addition, there are 30,000 emails she deleted which nobody ever saw. Newsweek is not exactly an impartial source on this and clearly never even asked, why did she have her own server and what happened to 30,000 emails. And where are all the emails concerning the details with Russia, Uranium mines, and several other issues. Wow, they disappeared along with IRS and State Department Hard Drives. If she had nothing to hide, why not just turn over all the emails and the server without wiping it first. Seriously, this is okay with you from a woman who now has a mansion, is worth at least $50M dollars, has $2B in her charity, a lot of it from people and countries she still hasn’t revealed, and for some reason, only returns %10 of the money to the people she is supposedly raising it for. There is so much evidence of corruption with this woman and her husband, you can’t possibly ignore or explain it all.
Rory From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Bill Prince Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 11:04 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [political] [utah] Oh, are you talking about Colin Powell or Condoleezza Rice? http://www.newsweek.com/colin-powell-emails-hillary-clinton-424187 bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 3/23/2016 10:54 AM, Rory Conaway wrote: I've been called worse than dumb so I can live with that. What do you call someone who supports a candidate under investigation for obvious criminal activity, probably traitorous, and the fact that she became incredibly rich selling influence in the State Department? Nothing personal but dumb doesn't even come close, but definitely intellectual dishonest. Rory -----Original Message----- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Bill Prince Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 9:48 AM To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [political] [utah] Fascinating. Trump actually can offend some people. Probably the smarter ones... bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 3/23/2016 7:10 AM, Chuck McCown wrote: This is the outcome I would have expected. -----Original Message----- From: Josh Reynolds Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 11:45 PM To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: [AFMUG] [political] [utah] Chuck, So I'm watching the polling right now.. it's *very* early, only 3% (R) and 11% (D) ballots counted. [R] So far It's Cruz 58.8%, Kasich 22.0%, Trump 19.2%. [D] So far it's Sanders 74.8%, Clinton 24.1%. Since you're over there in beautiful Utah, I'm interested in hearing your (and others) thoughts on this so far.
