I don't have a firm date yet. I am in the process of nailing down lead times on the enclosures and validating some final design choices.
I would guess 90ish days. I'll be able to firm this up a bit over the next couple of weeks. On Mar 28, 2016 2:15 PM, "Matt" <matt.mailingli...@gmail.com> wrote: > What is time frame on 1u configurable sync injector? > > > On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) > <li...@packetflux.com> wrote: > > There's already one of these on the roadmap. Unit which will sync two > > radios. > > > > On Mar 27, 2016 11:37 AM, "George Skorup" <geo...@cbcast.com> wrote: > >> > >> Woulda been nice. Oh well. > >> > >> This I think is another good example for a UGPS-like SyncPipe. Could I > >> send a climber up to take the Parasitic pipe out and then throw on a > >> SyncInjector at the bottom... sure. Burning a GigE SyncInjector for a 1 > AP > >> site though. > >> > >> On 3/26/2016 6:42 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote: > >> > >> I wouldn't recommend this. Mainly because it's going to unbalance the > >> gigabit ethernet pairs and likely cause ethernet errors as the power > >> consumption changes. > >> > >> On Mar 26, 2016 7:15 AM, "George Skorup" <geo...@cbcast.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> Dumb question, probably best answered by Forrest. Say I have one of the > >>> newer universal Parasitic SyncPipes. Newer meaning Rev G+. Universal > meaning > >>> you can use them on standard Canopy 30VDC POE and the stupid 320/430 > pinout, > >>> since they tap only the two power pins that don't change. OK, so now > say I > >>> take a GigE injector and configure a 450 AP to negotiate 1000BaseT. > Will > >>> GigE work... "through" the Parasitic pipe? I know the 10/100 data > pairs are > >>> passed straight through. Not sure about the other two pairs. Since it > taps > >>> only two pins for power, I doubt there's any bonding going on. > >> > >> > > >
