I have no idea what you just said. Currently, content providers are using proprietary DRM (in many cases) to send content feeds.
For instance, we have 5 content providers and our own sat farm now. Each one has a different demarc box for encryption and keys, and we have to manage keys for content for each user and each set top. It's a fucking nightmare. We also are limited to a handful of set tops that will work with their systems. On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:24 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > Forcing providers from using proprietary technology on their infrastructure > to maximize performance of their service into hammering a square peg into a > round hole so everybody has a square peg will not turn out well. It will > however ensure that digital theft becomes a much simpler process, so thats > always good. > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:16 AM, <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: >> >> If you actually read the FCC document, I cannot help but thinking this is >> almost forcing al la carte on the cable providers. Looks like good stuff to >> me. >> >> From: That One Guy /sarcasm >> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2016 9:44 AM >> To: af@afmug.com >> Subject: [AFMUG] ot: this is our priority? >> >> >> https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2016/04/15/obama-is-urging-the-fcc-to-open-up-the-cable-box-so-you-can-watch-tv-how-you-really-want/ >> >> First world problems. >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as > part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
