Since your kleptocracy platform won't be popular, what story will you
tell in order to get elected?
How will you sell your plan to the legislative branch who will actually
have to make it law?
I just don't know if this plan has been thought through very thoroughly.
https://youtu.be/93B072j-E3I?t=8
On 4/15/2016 12:55 PM, Glen Waldrop wrote:
I want to get in first and ask to be VP with a cut of the profits...
*From:* That One Guy /sarcasm <mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
*Sent:* Friday, April 15, 2016 11:52 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ot: this is our priority?
Thats just stupid. When Im president, I will just do away with that
funny business. Im still going to raise taxes to 90 percent, but im
not redistributing that to anybody but me.
I dont know much about the cable tv industry or its actual
infrastructure obviously
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com
<mailto:j...@kyneticwifi.com>> wrote:
It IS delivered to the customer via the ISP, but it's encrypted due to
content / rebroadcast rights blah blah blah
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:44 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm
<thatoneguyst...@gmail.com <mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Well, I learned something. I just assume all content was only
delivered to
> the service provider, and then the service provider handed it to the
> consumer via their delivery infrastructure. That would make more
sense to
> me.
>
>
> I just never saw entertainment (internet included) as being
something worthy
> of any federal attention
>
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Josh Reynolds
<j...@kyneticwifi.com <mailto:j...@kyneticwifi.com>>
> wrote:
>>
>> It's a bit of a mess really.
>>
>> You have inbound content feeds or peering, which is often
encrypted.
>> This hits their different "content servers" in your network
that you
>> often have no control over. A customer ONT has a list of
channels and
>> encryption keys programmed into it, and it sends off a bunch of
>> multicast join requests for the content to these content
servers. The
>> content is end-end encrypted. You're kind of a dumb pipe in this
>> scenario.
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:34 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm
>>
>> <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com <mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>>
wrote:
>> > maybe i misunderstand how this works, I assumed the service
provider
>> > gets
>> > the content, however they get the content, then delivers the
content on
>> > their own system to the set top box. Are you saying the
content provider
>> > delivers the content directly to the consumer set top box
currently just
>> > transiting the service provider network?
>> >
>> > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Josh Reynolds
<j...@kyneticwifi.com <mailto:j...@kyneticwifi.com>>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I have no idea what you just said.
>> >>
>> >> Currently, content providers are using proprietary DRM (in
many cases)
>> >> to send content feeds.
>> >>
>> >> For instance, we have 5 content providers and our own sat
farm now.
>> >> Each one has a different demarc box for encryption and keys,
and we
>> >> have to manage keys for content for each user and each set
top. It's a
>> >> fucking nightmare. We also are limited to a handful of set
tops that
>> >> will work with their systems.
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:24 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm
>> >> <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com
<mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >> > Forcing providers from using proprietary technology on their
>> >> > infrastructure
>> >> > to maximize performance of their service into hammering a
square peg
>> >> > into a
>> >> > round hole so everybody has a square peg will not turn out
well. It
>> >> > will
>> >> > however ensure that digital theft becomes a much simpler
process, so
>> >> > thats
>> >> > always good.
>> >> >
>> >> > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:16 AM, <ch...@wbmfg.com
<mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> If you actually read the FCC document, I cannot help but
thinking
>> >> >> this
>> >> >> is
>> >> >> almost forcing al la carte on the cable providers. Looks
like good
>> >> >> stuff to
>> >> >> me.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> From: That One Guy /sarcasm
>> >> >> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2016 9:44 AM
>> >> >> To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
>> >> >> Subject: [AFMUG] ot: this is our priority?
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2016/04/15/obama-is-urging-the-fcc-to-open-up-the-cable-box-so-you-can-watch-tv-how-you-really-want/
>> >> >>
>> >> >> First world problems.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you
don't see your
>> >> >> team
>> >> >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of
the team.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't
see your
>> >> > team
>> >> > as
>> >> > part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't
see your team
>> > as
>> > part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>
>
>
>
> --
> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see
your team as
> part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your
team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
