That should do it. selling the plan to the legislative branch should be easy enough, just offer them a cut.
I'd also like to get in early and request a cabinet position... I don't need a cut of the profits, just a job that isn't to much work but has plenty of opportunities for accepting bribes. On Apr 15, 2016 5:03 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: Im legalizing pot, therefore i will win On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote: > Since your kleptocracy platform won't be popular, what story will you tell > in order to get elected? > > How will you sell your plan to the legislative branch who will actually > have to make it law? > > I just don't know if this plan has been thought through very thoroughly. > https://youtu.be/93B072j-E3I?t=8 > > > > On 4/15/2016 12:55 PM, Glen Waldrop wrote: > > I want to get in first and ask to be VP with a cut of the profits... > > > > *From:* That One Guy /sarcasm <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Friday, April 15, 2016 11:52 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ot: this is our priority? > > Thats just stupid. When Im president, I will just do away with that funny > business. Im still going to raise taxes to 90 percent, but im not > redistributing that to anybody but me. > > I dont know much about the cable tv industry or its actual infrastructure > obviously > > > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Josh Reynolds < <j...@kyneticwifi.com> > j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote: > >> It IS delivered to the customer via the ISP, but it's encrypted due to >> content / rebroadcast rights blah blah blah >> >> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:44 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm >> <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Well, I learned something. I just assume all content was only delivered >> to >> > the service provider, and then the service provider handed it to the >> > consumer via their delivery infrastructure. That would make more sense >> to >> > me. >> > >> > >> > I just never saw entertainment (internet included) as being something >> worthy >> > of any federal attention >> > >> > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> It's a bit of a mess really. >> >> >> >> You have inbound content feeds or peering, which is often encrypted. >> >> This hits their different "content servers" in your network that you >> >> often have no control over. A customer ONT has a list of channels and >> >> encryption keys programmed into it, and it sends off a bunch of >> >> multicast join requests for the content to these content servers. The >> >> content is end-end encrypted. You're kind of a dumb pipe in this >> >> scenario. >> >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:34 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm >> >> >> >> <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > maybe i misunderstand how this works, I assumed the service provider >> >> > gets >> >> > the content, however they get the content, then delivers the content >> on >> >> > their own system to the set top box. Are you saying the content >> provider >> >> > delivers the content directly to the consumer set top box currently >> just >> >> > transiting the service provider network? >> >> > >> >> > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Josh Reynolds < >> j...@kyneticwifi.com> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> I have no idea what you just said. >> >> >> >> >> >> Currently, content providers are using proprietary DRM (in many >> cases) >> >> >> to send content feeds. >> >> >> >> >> >> For instance, we have 5 content providers and our own sat farm now. >> >> >> Each one has a different demarc box for encryption and keys, and we >> >> >> have to manage keys for content for each user and each set top. >> It's a >> >> >> fucking nightmare. We also are limited to a handful of set tops that >> >> >> will work with their systems. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:24 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm >> >> >> <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> > Forcing providers from using proprietary technology on their >> >> >> > infrastructure >> >> >> > to maximize performance of their service into hammering a square >> peg >> >> >> > into a >> >> >> > round hole so everybody has a square peg will not turn out well. >> It >> >> >> > will >> >> >> > however ensure that digital theft becomes a much simpler process, >> so >> >> >> > thats >> >> >> > always good. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:16 AM, <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> If you actually read the FCC document, I cannot help but thinking >> >> >> >> this >> >> >> >> is >> >> >> >> almost forcing al la carte on the cable providers. Looks like >> good >> >> >> >> stuff to >> >> >> >> me. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From: That One Guy /sarcasm >> >> >> >> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2016 9:44 AM >> >> >> >> To: <af@afmug.com>af@afmug.com >> >> >> >> Subject: [AFMUG] ot: this is our priority? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2016/04/15/obama-is-urging-the-fcc-to-open-up-the-cable-box-so-you-can-watch-tv-how-you-really-want/> >> https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2016/04/15/obama-is-urging-the-fcc-to-open-up-the-cable-box-so-you-can-watch-tv-how-you-really-want/ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> First world problems. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see >> your >> >> >> >> team >> >> >> >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > -- >> >> >> > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see >> your >> >> >> > team >> >> >> > as >> >> >> > part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >> team >> >> > as >> >> > part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >> team as >> > part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> > > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
