Sleep learning would be nice, but there is only so much sex a human can want.
From: Cameron Crum
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 7:34 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ot: this is our priority?
I need some soma....
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:20 AM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:
Maybe you couch it in terms of this 90% tax being to fund free weed for
everyone. Once that's in place, nobody will pay attention to how much you're
skimming.
Since not everyone is in to pot, you might need to expand beyond marijuana to
free diversions for everyone. Music, drugs, movies, etc.
Actually, did you all read Aldous Huxley's Brave New World? This is starting
to sound like a mash up between that and Idiocracy.
On 4/18/2016 1:23 AM, Cameron Crum wrote:
Hasn't Gary Johnson been trying that "legalize pot" platform for the last
3-4 elections? It hasn't really done much for him. Of course he is lacking the
whole take your money thing too. Maybe that will appeal to the dope smokers?
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:28 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com>
wrote:
That sounds perfect!
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 9:53 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm
<thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
You want to be head of the department of bribery and skullduggery? Im
going to need a good man in that spot, need to get set up to take payments from
cash to bitcoin to farmers daughters. Its all about ensuring a fluid customer
experience
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 8:39 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com>
wrote:
That should do it. selling the plan to the legislative branch should
be easy enough, just offer them a cut.
I'd also like to get in early and request a cabinet position... I
don't need a cut of the profits, just a job that isn't to much work but has
plenty of opportunities for accepting bribes.
On Apr 15, 2016 5:03 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm"
<thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
Im legalizing pot, therefore i will win
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Adam Moffett
<dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:
Since your kleptocracy platform won't be popular, what story will
you tell in order to get elected?
How will you sell your plan to the legislative branch who will
actually have to make it law?
I just don't know if this plan has been thought through very
thoroughly.
https://youtu.be/93B072j-E3I?t=8
On 4/15/2016 12:55 PM, Glen Waldrop wrote:
I want to get in first and ask to be VP with a cut of the
profits...
From: That One Guy /sarcasm
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2016 11:52 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ot: this is our priority?
Thats just stupid. When Im president, I will just do away with
that funny business. Im still going to raise taxes to 90 percent, but im not
redistributing that to anybody but me.
I dont know much about the cable tv industry or its actual
infrastructure obviously
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Josh Reynolds
<j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote:
It IS delivered to the customer via the ISP, but it's
encrypted due to
content / rebroadcast rights blah blah blah
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:44 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm
<thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, I learned something. I just assume all content was
only delivered to
> the service provider, and then the service provider handed
it to the
> consumer via their delivery infrastructure. That would make
more sense to
> me.
>
>
> I just never saw entertainment (internet included) as being
something worthy
> of any federal attention
>
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Josh Reynolds
<j...@kyneticwifi.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> It's a bit of a mess really.
>>
>> You have inbound content feeds or peering, which is often
encrypted.
>> This hits their different "content servers" in your
network that you
>> often have no control over. A customer ONT has a list of
channels and
>> encryption keys programmed into it, and it sends off a
bunch of
>> multicast join requests for the content to these content
servers. The
>> content is end-end encrypted. You're kind of a dumb pipe
in this
>> scenario.
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:34 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm
>>
>> <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > maybe i misunderstand how this works, I assumed the
service provider
>> > gets
>> > the content, however they get the content, then delivers
the content on
>> > their own system to the set top box. Are you saying the
content provider
>> > delivers the content directly to the consumer set top
box currently just
>> > transiting the service provider network?
>> >
>> > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Josh Reynolds
<j...@kyneticwifi.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I have no idea what you just said.
>> >>
>> >> Currently, content providers are using proprietary DRM
(in many cases)
>> >> to send content feeds.
>> >>
>> >> For instance, we have 5 content providers and our own
sat farm now.
>> >> Each one has a different demarc box for encryption and
keys, and we
>> >> have to manage keys for content for each user and each
set top. It's a
>> >> fucking nightmare. We also are limited to a handful of
set tops that
>> >> will work with their systems.
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:24 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm
>> >> <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > Forcing providers from using proprietary technology
on their
>> >> > infrastructure
>> >> > to maximize performance of their service into
hammering a square peg
>> >> > into a
>> >> > round hole so everybody has a square peg will not
turn out well. It
>> >> > will
>> >> > however ensure that digital theft becomes a much
simpler process, so
>> >> > thats
>> >> > always good.
>> >> >
>> >> > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:16 AM, <ch...@wbmfg.com>
wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> If you actually read the FCC document, I cannot help
but thinking
>> >> >> this
>> >> >> is
>> >> >> almost forcing al la carte on the cable providers.
Looks like good
>> >> >> stuff to
>> >> >> me.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> From: That One Guy /sarcasm
>> >> >> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2016 9:44 AM
>> >> >> To: af@afmug.com
>> >> >> Subject: [AFMUG] ot: this is our priority?
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2016/04/15/obama-is-urging-the-fcc-to-open-up-the-cable-box-so-you-can-watch-tv-how-you-really-want/
>> >> >>
>> >> >> First world problems.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you
don't see your
>> >> >> team
>> >> >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part
of the team.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you
don't see your
>> >> > team
>> >> > as
>> >> > part of yourself you have already failed as part of
the team.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you
don't see your team
>> > as
>> > part of yourself you have already failed as part of the
team.
>
>
>
>
> --
> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't
see your team as
> part of yourself you have already failed as part of the
team.
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see
your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your
team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your
team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
