On the wan side.

> On Apr 30, 2016, at 8:33 AM, David Kunat <m...@davidkunat.com> wrote:
> 
> Do they have one with a SFP port?
> 
>> On Apr 30, 2016, at 7:29 AM, <ch...@wbmfg.com> <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>> 
>> There is a version of it that has an optical GPON interface too. 
>>  
>> From: Josh Baird
>> Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 5:46 PM
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Calix or others 802.11ac Home  Gateways
>>  
>> So.. are most people using the GigaCenter 844E?
>>  
>>> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Paul Stewart <p...@paulstewart.org> wrote:
>>> Ahh.. interesting .. thanks for that …
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Craig Schmaderer
>>> Sent: April 29, 2016 6:10 PM
>>> 
>>> 
>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Calix or others 802.11ac Home Gateways
>>>  
>>> 
>>> All routers do have this default Admin that the home owners can use to do 
>>> some settings.  The Support account is the one that we use that gives you 
>>> all the settings, and voip settings, and remote management. 
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> <image003.jpg>
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> <image004.jpg>
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Craig R. Schmaderer
>>> 
>>> CEO | Skywave Wireless, Inc.
>>> 
>>> Ph: 402-372-1975 | Fax: 402-372-1058
>>> 
>>> Direct: 402-372-1052
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of ch...@wbmfg.com
>>> Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 4:12 PM
>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Calix or others 802.11ac Home Gateways
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> I think that is the portal.  The customer uses the QR code on the router. 
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> From: Paul Stewart
>>> 
>>> Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 2:21 PM
>>> 
>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>> 
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Calix or others 802.11ac Home Gateways
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Is that via the home gateway itself or via a centralized system (like TR69 
>>> portal) etc?
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of ch...@wbmfg.com
>>> Sent: April 29, 2016 1:37 PM
>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Calix or others 802.11ac Home Gateways
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> The customers do have the ability to set up curfews, usage rules, time of 
>>> day usage, rules for particular devices etc. 
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> From: Sterling Jacobson
>>> 
>>> Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 10:20 AM
>>> 
>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>> 
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Calix or others 802.11ac Home Gateways
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Sean, do they have access to the calix themselves?
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Sean Heskett
>>> Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 10:02 AM
>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Calix or others 802.11ac Home Gateways
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> People don't really call that much once they have a calix.  UPnP opens most 
>>> ports that users would need unless they are running their own servers 
>>> (which we don't allow anyway) but if they have their own sever surely they 
>>> are technical enough to figure out port forwarding etc.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Thursday, April 28, 2016, Sterling Jacobson <sterl...@avative.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> That sounds interesting.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> I kind of like the idea of a rented supported system.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> But I don’t like the idea of people calling in every time their wireless 
>>> doesn’t reach their attic, or to open up ports to their gaming thingy.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> So my real question is this, at $7 a month, does it make enough money to 
>>> hire someone full time to answer the phones on these and be the go-to guy 
>>> for every single problem on their internal network?
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> If not, then I’m fine staying completely away from this (and hiring people 
>>> to man the phone calls).
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> From: Af [mailto:javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af-boun...@afmug.com');] On 
>>> Behalf Of Craig Schmaderer
>>> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 5:01 PM
>>> To: javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af@afmug.com');
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Calix or others 802.11ac Home Gateways
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> It is a addon straight from calix.  Ask your sales rep.
>>> 
>>> Craig schmaderer
>>> Skywave Wireless, Inc.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 6:21 AM -0700, "Chris Fabien" 
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ch...@lakenetmi.com');> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Craig how are you getting the 5yr warranty?
>>> 
>>> On Apr 28, 2016 9:01 AM, "Craig Schmaderer" 
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cr...@skywaveconnect.com');> wrote:
>>> 
>>> If you use consumer connect the are even cheaper.  Best routers i have ever 
>>> sold.  We are starting to use their gigapoints with a 844E and sell a $7 
>>> managed service.  We have about a 90% take rate.  I also get them with 5 
>>> year warrantys so i know i will never loose money on them. They also have 
>>> an app for the home owner that we are starting to use. 
>>> 
>>> Craig schmaderer
>>> Skywave Wireless, Inc.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:04 AM -0700, "Chuck McCown" 
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ch...@wbmfg.com');> wrote:
>>> 
>>> We have been renting them out for $8/mo
>>> 
>>> Nice thing is we can totally get in and troubleshoot anything.
>>> 
>>> And the parents can control which devices and which services they allow 
>>> their kids to use. 
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> From: Sean Heskett
>>> 
>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2016 10:39 AM
>>> 
>>> To: javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af@afmug.com');
>>> 
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Calix or others 802.11ac Home Gateways
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Best router ever!  Highly recommend them.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> We sell it as a managed wifi service instead of selling just the router.  
>>> Customer pays $99 "setup fee" and $12/mo.  Clients love them and so do our 
>>> support staff.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> -Sean 
>>> 
>>> On Wednesday, April 27, 2016, Gino Villarini 
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ginovi...@gmail.com');> wrote:
>>> 
>>> We are looking for a Home Gateway / Router that supports 802.11AC wifi and 
>>> gigabit speeds on the LAN.  
>>> 
>>> I have read that Calix is a good option, what is the cost? Experience with 
>>> them or others?
>>> 
>> 
>>  

Reply via email to