Maybe this is the answer to my question “how can I get customers to pay extra for IPv6?”
From: Glen Waldrop Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2016 7:08 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Strict NAT message on Xbox One? All of this is true. From: Ken Hohhof Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2016 3:20 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Strict NAT message on Xbox One? It’s so annoying when a big company like Microsoft makes up nonstandard terms like open/moderate/strict NAT, without really explaining what those terms mean. And imply the ISP is at fault for blocking ports which need to be “opened”, instead of explaining that port forwarding, default DMZ host, or UPnP needs to be configured on the customer’s NAT router, and the game console will need a static IP on the LAN or a DHCP reservation in the router. Also, is it true this is only an issue for peer-to-peer games, not cloud hosted games? From: Justin Wilson Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2016 2:41 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Strict NAT message on Xbox One? My MUM presentation has some info on Xbox and Nat. I will be doing an expanded post in the near future to supplement the presentation. http://www.mtin.net/blog/?p=1178 Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net --- http://www.mtin.net Owner/CEO xISP Solutions- Consulting – Data Centers - Bandwidth http://www.midwest-ix.com COO/Chairman Internet Exchange - Peering - Distributed Fabric On May 8, 2016, at 11:06 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: I assume a cpe is the same config as an air router. Our dump file sets an ip outside the dhcp pool in the air router as dmz. We just tell them the ip to set on their device, no problems thus far On May 7, 2016 9:22 AM, "Ty Featherling" <tyfeatherl...@gmail.com> wrote: Can you out them in the DMZ behind that radio? On May 7, 2016 1:30 AM, "Jon Auer" <j...@tapodi.net> wrote: For game consoles you basically enable UPnP or deal with a bunch of port forwarding. Xbox One is fairly sane. WiiU literally wants all of UDP forwarded. On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 11:19 PM, Michael Gawlowski <m...@triadwireless.net> wrote: Anyone had this issue? The customer is behind a ubiquiti running NAT with the ubiquiti using a public IP behind one of our Mikrotik's. The Mikrotik does not have any ports blocked, either. Any ideas? Thank you, Michael Gawlowski Triad Wireless, LLC
