upgrade to 6.35.2 unless you have a specific reason ... The old version may be the cause of other issues too.
Regards Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet & Telecom 7266 SW 48 Street Miami, FL 33155 Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected] > From: "Jerry Head" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 2:11:47 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Routers and VOIP QOS > I just looked at mine, embarrassingly old at 6.1 > On 5/12/2016 12:53 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: >> It was not there in 6.19. >> From: Josh Luthman >> Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 12:50 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Routers and VOIP QOS >> I want to say earlier than that but I don't have anything older either. >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 1:49 PM, George Skorup < [email protected] > wrote: >>> I think that was added in 6.25 or so? The oldest I have on the network is >>> 6.27 >>> and it's there. >>> On 5/12/2016 9:29 AM, Jerry Head wrote: >>>> The Torch on my CCR does not look like that, no DSCP option at all..... >>>> On 5/11/2016 11:54 AM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote: >>>>> Make sure you are using the right settings in Torch.... >>>>> and you can always sort on the DSCP Marks. >>>>> You should see something like in the attached picture... >>>>> Faisal Imtiaz >>>>> Snappy Internet & Telecom >>>>> 7266 SW 48 Street >>>>> Miami, FL 33155 >>>>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 >>>>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected] >>>>>> From: "Andreas Wiatowski" mailto:[email protected] >>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 11:46:07 AM >>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Routers and VOIP QOS >>>>>> I’ve been trying to see DSCP marks in torch on our CRR’s… can’t seem to >>>>>> see >>>>>> anything in the interface. I’m going to try a packet capture and view in >>>>>> Wireshark. >>>>>> Thanks for your input. >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> ______________________________ >>>>>> Andreas Wiatowski | CEO >>>>>> Silo Wireless Inc. >>>>>> Email [email protected] >>>>>> 19 Sage Court >>>>>> Brantford, Ontario N3R 7T4 (CANADA) >>>>>> Tel +1.519.449.5656 Extension-600 |Fax +1.519.449.5536 |Toll Free >>>>>> +1.866.727.4138 >>>>>> From: Af [ mailto:[email protected] ] On Behalf Of Faisal Imtiaz >>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 10:48 AM >>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Routers and VOIP QOS >>>>>> Andreas, >>>>>> Yes, here is the logic.... >>>>>> PBX should mark packets correctly (RTP packets as well as SIP >>>>>> signaling... for >>>>>> packets going towards to the CPE). >>>>>> Phone CPE should mark packets correctly... (for packets going to the PBX) >>>>>> Routers typically are not constrained on their pipes, so traffic flows >>>>>> well. >>>>>> Unless you are using some sort of queues to restrict traffic flow.... >>>>>> then you >>>>>> have to make sure that dscp/qos marked traffic flows with priority. >>>>>> Most radio's will respect DSCP/QoS marks and allocate priority >>>>>> accordingly... >>>>>> (check with your radio mfg / firmware version, config etc). >>>>>> BTW you can easily see the DSCP/QoS marks if you use TORCH on the MT, it >>>>>> is real >>>>>> time.... :) >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> Faisal Imtiaz >>>>>> Snappy Internet & Telecom >>>>>> 7266 SW 48 Street >>>>>> Miami, FL 33155 >>>>>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 >>>>>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected] >>>>>>> From: "Andreas Wiatowski" < [email protected] > >>>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 10:17:03 AM >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Routers and VOIP QOS >>>>>>> Faisal, >>>>>>> So the packets should still contain DSCP tags regardless of layer2 or >>>>>>> layer3? >>>>>>> Sounds like I will need to do some packet captures. >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> ______________________________ >>>>>>> Andreas Wiatowski | CEO >>>>>>> Silo Wireless Inc. >>>>>>> Email [email protected] >>>>>>> 19 Sage Court >>>>>>> Brantford, Ontario N3R 7T4 (CANADA) >>>>>>> Tel +1.519.449.5656 Extension-600|Fax +1.519.449.5536 |Toll Free >>>>>>> +1.866.727.4138 >>>>>>> From: Af [ mailto:[email protected] ] On Behalf Of Faisal Imtiaz >>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 9:35 AM >>>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Routers and VOIP QOS >>>>>>> Hi Andreas, >>>>>>> in our network, we handle this as follows:- >>>>>>> 1) we make sure that the PBX is marking the packets with the DSCP tags >>>>>>> correctly. >>>>>>> 2) we make sure that the phone/iad are marking the packets with DSCP >>>>>>> tags >>>>>>> correctly. >>>>>>> 3) we make sure that the Radios (AP & CPE) are using firmware that >>>>>>> respects the >>>>>>> DSCP Tags, and provides them with appropriate priority >>>>>>> 4) we don't do anything on our routers (in our network). if we have to, >>>>>>> the only >>>>>>> thing we do on the customer router (Dmarc) is to make sure that the >>>>>>> dscp tags >>>>>>> are correct. >>>>>>> And this works very well for us. >>>>>>> Regards. >>>>>>> Faisal Imtiaz >>>>>>> Snappy Internet & Telecom >>>>>>> 7266 SW 48 Street >>>>>>> Miami, FL 33155 >>>>>>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 >>>>>>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected] >>>>>>>> From: "Andreas Wiatowski" < [email protected] > >>>>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 1:39:36 AM >>>>>>>> Subject: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Routers and VOIP QOS >>>>>>>> Hello All! >>>>>>>> We have about 90 sites primarily with CCR’s of various flavours. We >>>>>>>> have yet to >>>>>>>> implement any type of QOS for our VOIP..but we are starting to feel >>>>>>>> some >>>>>>>> quality pain with a couple of our “ON NET” PBX/SIP products. >>>>>>>> I have been reading about using mangle rules to mark connections and >>>>>>>> then >>>>>>>> packets, then setting up a QUEUE tree in MT where the packet marks are >>>>>>>> prioritized. We are fully routed with no layer 2 / bridging. I’m >>>>>>>> wondering if I >>>>>>>> can accomplish the same thing by just identifying the IP of my >>>>>>>> Multi-Tenant PBX >>>>>>>> box and any traffic moving to and from…and prioritizing it as 1. >>>>>>>> Secondly, do I >>>>>>>> have to do this on every single router on my network? >>>>>>>> OR Is it a better practice to IDENTIFY DCSP or TOS, mark and >>>>>>>> prioritize that >>>>>>>> instead. Just looking for the best way to unify this across my network. >>>>>>>> Anyone have examples? Many of the examples I have seen really relate >>>>>>>> to SOHO >>>>>>>> type situations…. We are talking much larger here. Most of my >>>>>>>> transport is >>>>>>>> 200Mbps to 10Gbps between sites. >>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>> Andreas Wiatowski, CEO >>>>>>>> Silo Wireless Inc. >>>>>>>> 519-449-5656 x-600
