hmm, i will check into that. Pretty sure with ubnt we're using kp performance.
With epmp, i think it is bundled antennas...
----- Original Message -----
From: Ken Hohhof
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP
Jay, I suspect the difference you are seeing may be mainly in the antennas.
2.4 GHz from any vendor should penetrate the same, the radio waves don’t care
what brand radio launched them. And I think the difference between the
platforms will be most evident in low interference environment where they can
achieve their full modulation and throughput. With low SNR, I think it’s kind
of like arguing Ferrari vs Porsche for off road racing, neither will be able to
show off its capabilities. Receiver sensitivity and bits/sec/Hz won’t matter.
From: CBB - Jay Fuller
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 3:28 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP
Also interested in interference rejection of the pmp450 - is there any (in
2.4)
we are getting better foliage penetration with ubnt 2.4 than epmp 2.4 - - and
from the performance of
the epmp 2.4 i wish wish wish it penetrated better!
----- Original Message -----
From: Matt
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 2:25 PM
Subject: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP
We have mostly PMP100 and PMP450 deployed. Some Ubiquiti we tried and
some we inherited as well. Have some ePMP we have tested but so far
have not deployed more then couple test links.
For those who have tried both ePMP and PMP450 what are the differences
you have seen in performance? Interference tolerance among others?
For those that have gone with PMP450 over ePMP what was the reasoning?
