Once that cloud backup is done, it's done. :-)
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP ----- Original Message ----- From: "Eric Kuhnke" <eric.kuh...@gmail.com> To: af@afmug.com Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2016 4:24:42 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP and wow, those customers don't move much upstream AT ALL... There's nobody who left a torrent client open with the latest episode of game of thrones, or a Backblaze/Dropbox/whatever backup process trying to upload 200GB of the entire contents of their iMac. On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Josh Baird < joshba...@gmail.com > wrote: Indeed. 5 minute polling intervals (step = 300sec). I see real-time spikes in the ~60mbps range. On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Eric Kuhnke < eric.kuh...@gmail.com > wrote: <blockquote> What is your SNMP polling interval on that and RRD step size? If you're seeing peaks of 35 Mbps, I bet that your microburst peaks are actually around 55 Mbps but you're not seeing them due to >60 second polling. On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Josh Baird < joshba...@gmail.com > wrote: <blockquote> This is our most loaded 5Ghz ePMP AP: Inline image 1 Inline image 2 Users on this AP have plans from 1.5-10Mbps. I think it averages 70-80% of downlink frame usage during peak times, but I don't have a graph available because Cambium won't expose this as a percentage via SNMP (you have to look at the real-time value in the web UI). On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:41 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < thatoneguyst...@gmail.com > wrote: <blockquote> we are moving to epmp for cheap in 5ghz, the most populated ap only has like 12 users on 12/2 plans up to 8 miles, I dont see it scaling well compared to 450, but much better than the ubnt could ever dream. Its sync lets us do ABAB with no notable hit yet. 3ghz we are moving to 450 from a mix of ubnt shit and 320 garbage (though the 320 has been a beast) because the 1x gets us the edge of nlos On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Josh Luthman < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > wrote: <blockquote> PMP450 is better. It will win the interference war. It will offer a bit better bits/hz. If the revenue supports it, use it. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Matt < matt.mailingli...@gmail.com > wrote: <blockquote> We have mostly PMP100 and PMP450 deployed. Some Ubiquiti we tried and some we inherited as well. Have some ePMP we have tested but so far have not deployed more then couple test links. For those who have tried both ePMP and PMP450 what are the differences you have seen in performance? Interference tolerance among others? For those that have gone with PMP450 over ePMP what was the reasoning? </blockquote> -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote>
