Use a washer... Zaz 2 degree downtilt. Lol On Aug 15, 2016 3:25 PM, "Faisal Imtiaz" <fai...@snappytelecom.net> wrote:
Sitting back and just comparing the specs, I can believe the results. Both are excellent sectors, but if you do a line by line spec comparison you will see that RF Elements eeks out by a notch. The only thing to keep in mind is that Cambium is showing 2degree electrical down-tilt, and Rf Element does not have that. Regards. Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet & Telecom 7266 SW 48 Street Miami, FL 33155 Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net ------------------------------ *From: *"Paul McCall" <pa...@pdmnet.net> *To: *af@afmug.com *Sent: *Monday, August 15, 2016 2:16:34 PM *Subject: *[AFMUG] RF Elements vs. Cambium sectors I saw an interesting set of test results or someone testing an ePMP 1000 with RF Elements 17 db sector vs. Cambium ePMP 2000 with Cambium 2000 sector, and the performance was actually better with RF elements. Yet, Cambium’s new sector claims 35dB F/B vs. 29dB for RF Elements. Anybody using RF Elements sector with ePMP 1000 radios and getting good results on F/B GPS Sync issues? I know with the 1000 series, we needed 8 to 15 feet of vertical separation to make everything run smooth on Frequency re-use. It will “work” with less. Anyway, curious if that will be a problem with RF Elements in the same environment. I see RF elements has some bigger gain sectors as well. Paul McCall, President PDMNet, Inc. / Florida Broadband, Inc. 658 Old Dixie Highway Vero Beach, FL 32962 772-564-6800 pa...@pdmnet.net www.pdmnet.com www.floridabroadband.com
