Of course that graph is from an RRA/RRDtool, the question is how was the
data acquired on *N* poller interval...

ssh and script from the NMS server vs. snmpd and OIDs.

The good thing about exposing the bind9 data via snmp OIDs is that it's not
specific or proprietary to one type of NMS, if you want to have both a
cacti and an opennms server watching the same thing, you can.


On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Lewis Bergman <lewis.berg...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> RRD actually makes all those graphs possible
>
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016, 7:01 PM Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> IMHO putting hardcoded credentials into an NMS that allows it to ssh into
>> a bind server is a lot more risky than usign snmpd, snmp "extend" and
>> polling your new custom created OIDs.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Josh Baird <joshba...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Are you talking about something like this?
>>>
>>> [image: Inline image 1]
>>>
>>> You need to figure out how to get the data *out* of BIND.  Newer
>>> versions expose a statistics channel via XML that you can use to get data
>>> like this.  For the graph above, my NMS (Zenoss 4) SSH's into each DNS
>>> server and executes a little custom script that I wrote which returns
>>> Nagios-ish style data:
>>>
>>> OK|success=1022736319 referral=339 nxrrset=93439175 nxdomain=163271953
>>> recursion=373732835 failure=18408551 duplicate=13564673 dropped=0
>>> numzones=143 recursiveclients=2 rtt10=278 rtt10_100=430614909
>>> rtt100_500=52986868 rtt500_800=75607 rtt1600=989
>>>
>>> Zenoss then uses this data to produce the graph that I pasted above.
>>>
>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:43 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Im using DNSTOP to monitor real time activity on these servers I made
>>>> live (interesting to see just how perverse some of our customers are) but
>>>> is there a good tool for monitoring visually statistics, queries, cache,
>>>> errors, etc that doesnt involve building yet another server to monitor
>>>> these?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your
>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>>>
>>>
>>>

Reply via email to