why?
On 9/26/2016 8:43 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
Everyone's against policing these days.
;-)
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix><https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange><https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com>
*To: *af@afmug.com
*Sent: *Monday, September 26, 2016 6:55:27 PM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Throttling bandwidth over a gig
Depends on if he wants to police or shape. To police you don't need
much of a buffer, and it's a very hard cutoff. To shape (much better
user experience), he'll need something like RED, WRED, codel/fq_codel
and deeper buffers.
On Sep 26, 2016 6:19 PM, "Keefe John" <keefe...@ethoplex.com
<mailto:keefe...@ethoplex.com>> wrote:
wouldn't you want zero queue buffers for true rate limiting?
Buffers infer traffic shaping.
On 9/26/2016 3:37 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
I wouldn't say most, but many do. Normally switches don't have
the proper buffer depth for that kind of thing at scale,
unless using those super high throughput, very large buffer
data center oriented ASIC designs.
On Sep 26, 2016 3:27 PM, "TJ Trout" <t...@voltbb.com
<mailto:t...@voltbb.com>> wrote:
Do most managed switches like the netonix offer a rate
limiting/queue/bandwidth limit?
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Chris Wright
<ch...@velociter.net <mailto:ch...@velociter.net>> wrote:
They’re terribly inefficient, for one.
Chris Wright
Network Administrator
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com
<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On Behalf Of *Cameron Crum
*Sent:* Monday, September 26, 2016 12:31 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Throttling bandwidth over a gig
What is wrong with a simple queue?
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Carlos Alcantar
<car...@race.com <mailto:car...@race.com>> wrote:
we do it with ciena/cyan equipment as well. Your
going to be looking at more of a MEF type of switch
that can handle this of feature.
Carlos Alcantar
Race Communications / Race Team Member
1325 Howard Ave. #604, Burlingame, CA. 94010
Phone: +1 415 376 3314 <tel:%2B1%20415%20376%203314> /
car...@race.com <mailto:car...@race.com> /
http://www.race.com
________________________________________
From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com
<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>> on behalf of Jon Auer
<j...@tapodi.net <mailto:j...@tapodi.net>>
Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2016 4:29:25 PM
To: Animal Farm
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Throttling bandwidth over a gig
I'm using Ciena 3930s as CPE for our customers with
10G ports and, for those that have subrate services,
using them for shaping/policing.
It's a switch targetted at carrier ethernet demarc so
it has many useful QoS and OAM options.
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 1:10 PM, TJ Trout
<t...@voltbb.com
<mailto:t...@voltbb.com><mailto:t...@voltbb.com
<mailto:t...@voltbb.com>>> wrote:
What is the best way to throttle a customer to a
specific bandwidth threshold when they are using over
1G of bandwidth?
Should this be done at the switch? I have a feeling
that a simple queue probably won't work...
