I'm running two ad/malware/ransomware blocking, recursive, caching dns servers right now: one in Chicago and one in Dallas. My local one caches results from those.
... And this is for my house :P On Oct 26, 2016 9:45 AM, "Dennis Burgess" <dmburg...@linktechs.net> wrote: > Does it work, yes it is the same as a high performance DNS server, no. Is > a dedicated DNS resolvers expensive, no. Getting starting say under > 100-150 users, ok, for a while, once you go over that, really need to move > to dedicated resolvers. > > > Dennis Burgess – Network Solution Engineer – Consultant > MikroTik Certified Trainer/Consultant – MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE > > For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net > Radio Frequiency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com > Office: 314-735-0270 > E-Mail: dmburg...@linktechs.net > > -----Original Message----- > From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt > Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 8:54 AM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: [AFMUG] Mikrotik DNS Cache > > Is anyone using the Mikrotik DNS cache as there primary DNS resolver for > there clients? Say use a CCR and your largest upstreams DNS server as > parent. Should there be any issues with that? >
