Neither was... but I rebooted them anyhow.

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 3:29 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:

> log into the ubnt gear and verify neither are sitting at the unexpected
> reboot screen
>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Christopher Gray <
> cg...@graytechsoftware.com> wrote:
>
>> R1 is the only router with 1 Gbps ports. Everything is auto except 1
>> connection that requires manual settings.
>>
>> *R1* -- (Auto 1 G FD) ...Internet... (Manual 100 FD) -- *R2 *-- (Auto
>> 100 FD)  -- *R3* -- (Auto 100 FD) ...M5... (Auto 100 FD) -- *R4*
>>
>> MTU is set to 1500 on every port (and the UBNT link).
>>
>> Flow control is off, and none of the interfaces show any pause frames
>> received.
>>
>>
>> This is a live link, but it is only running ~ 1 Mbps otherwise.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Steve <li...@wavedirect.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Few questions come to mind.
>>>
>>> Are all set to auto negotiate or are they fixed at 100Mbit?
>>> What are the MTU's of each connection?
>>> Flow control turned on?
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Christopher Gray" <cg...@graytechsoftware.com>
>>> To: "af" <af@afmug.com>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 1:57:56 PM
>>> Subject: [AFMUG] Trouble Identifying Throughput Issue
>>>
>>> I have a section of my network that is lacking something, and I can't
>>> figure out where the problem is. I'm looking for any thoughts /
>>> suggestions.
>>>
>>> 4x MikroTik routers
>>>
>>> Link speeds:
>>> R1 -- (30 Mbps IP / Transport) -- R2 -- (100 Mbps Eth) -- R3 -- (75 Mbps
>>> UBNT M5) -- R4
>>>
>>> The limiting factor for traffic should be the Transport, and I expect to
>>> be
>>> able to get 30 Mbps across the system (one-way).
>>>
>>> Testing from R1 to R3 runs 30 Mbps.
>>>
>>> Testing from R2 to R4 runs 75 Mbps.
>>>
>>> Testing from R1 to R4 only runs 10 Mbps (instead of 30).
>>>
>>> Tests were one-way btest with 20 TCP streams.
>>>
>>> Any ideas for something that would cause this?
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>

Reply via email to