None of the above, unless a ridiculous number of ipv4 addresses are required, I'd find the money to acquire a sufficient number of ipv4 /24s (preferably in pieces like /22) through the official ARIN transfer process and consider the per-customer IP cost paid as an NRC for the transfer as part of the network build cost.
Option 4) one ipv4 per customer and ipv6 dual stack On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Sam Morris <w...@csilogan.com> wrote: > If you were starting a new network from scratch, how would you do your IP > addressing? > > Option 1) ipv6 - Doesn't appear that everything on the Internet supports > pure v6, which would require... > > Option 2) ipv6 with NAT64 or dual stack (or whatever would be a patch to > make Option 1 work)... or > > Option 3) ipv4 with private IP addresses and a single public v4 address at > the edges (and use CGN for the calea stuff - CGN which evidently comes with > its own set of problems...) > > Or is there a better option that I'm not thinking about? > > Deciding among these seems like picking which presidential candidate to > vote for - They all stink, and trying to decide which one stinks the > least... > > Thanks, > Sam >
