ptp sync and ptmp sync are two totally different animals On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Kurt Fankhauser <lists.wavel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> its not out yet so we will see, but I would assume it works flawless once > it gets here because it works fine on airfiber PTP and its based on the > same platform > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 2:24 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < > thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> does the airfiber ptmp have functional sync that actually syncs, or just >> sync like titanium had sync? >> >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Kurt Fankhauser < >> lists.wavel...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hopefulyl UBNT will step up their game now, its crucial to keeping >>> prices low that there is strong competition among venders. I am hoping the >>> Airfiber PTMP comes out soon so that this will beat Cambium back on price >>> with the 450 line which is sucking my wallet dry everyday. >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 1:15 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> the jist of it is like when Jesus turned water into wine, only now >>>> jesus is cambium, but he wants 35 bucks for the wine >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Justin Wilson <li...@mtin.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> http://www.mtin.net/blog/?p=1442 >>>>> Some Cliff Notes >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Justin Wilson >>>>> j...@mtin.net >>>>> >>>>> --- >>>>> http://www.mtin.net Owner/CEO >>>>> xISP Solutions- Consulting – Data Centers - Bandwidth >>>>> >>>>> http://www.midwest-ix.com COO/Chairman >>>>> Internet Exchange - Peering - Distributed Fabric >>>>> >>>>> On Nov 30, 2016, at 12:47 PM, Dennis Burgess <dmburg...@linktechs.net> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Someone want to write up the entire thing? What it is etc? how it >>>>> works vs having us all listen to a webinar :? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *Dennis Burgess** –** Network Solution Engineer – Consultant * >>>>> MikroTik Certified Trainer/Consultant >>>>> <http://www.linktechs.net/productcart/pc/viewcontent.asp?idpage=5> – >>>>> MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE >>>>> >>>>> For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net >>>>> Radio Frequiency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com >>>>> Office: 314-735-0270 <(314)%20735-0270> >>>>> E-Mail: dmburg...@linktechs.net >>>>> >>>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On >>>>> Behalf Of *Steve D >>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 30, 2016 11:28 AM >>>>> *To:* af <af@afmug.com> >>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! >>>>> >>>>> What, you mean they didn't just change the 5's to 3's in the GUI? >>>>> >>>>> Learn something new everyday. :p >>>>> >>>>> -Steve D >>>>> >>>>> On Nov 30, 2016 8:41 AM, "Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> There are probably hardware filters on the RF side. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> bp >>>>> >>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 11/30/2016 8:35 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: >>>>> >>>>> so I have a technical question. The m365 gear is ssupposed to be >>>>> downconverted 5ghz, is that a software downconvert? (FCC ID issues aside) >>>>> If thats the case could this be loaded onto m365 to turn it into epmp >>>>> 5ghz? >>>>> I assume the downconvert is more than a software load, but man, I >>>>> literally >>>>> would make a very inappropriate mess if I could dump the ubnt 3ghz network >>>>> into epmp in one move >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> 25% is what I remember. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------ Original Message ------ >>>>> From: "Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com> >>>>> To: af@afmug.com >>>>> Sent: 11/30/2016 11:29:32 AM >>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> That's a very interesting point. I don't think their margins are that >>>>> low though. They've done what, 40mil units sold? I think that was the last >>>>> number I heard. >>>>> >>>>> On Nov 30, 2016 10:27 AM, "Kurt Fankhauser" <lists.wavel...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> If Ubiquitis margins were low then Cambium could very well end up >>>>> making more money on a radio that Ubiquiti engineered, manufactures, and >>>>> delivered. Lol >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:24 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> This is capitalism in its finest form. Cambium just upped the bar >>>>> substantially. The market had a very serious issue, and they solved it, >>>>> while still generating substantial revenue. Im curious what their profit >>>>> per hardware unit sold is compared to the profit per license, with no real >>>>> liability. Hopefully this will force ubnt to really focus efforts on real >>>>> sync that actually works and get an actual legitimate support channel. Or >>>>> even better, sell their radios preloaded with the EPMP load and work out a >>>>> discount for AP licenses through them for their customers. Mikrotik I >>>>> assume is just saying "meh, our products are good" >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Kurt Fankhauser < >>>>> lists.wavel...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> This is pretty neat with the whole Mikrotik thing, basically you can >>>>> run a Mikrotik CPE network and be GPS synchronized then... >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Jason Wilson < >>>>> ja...@remotelylocated.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> ePMP Elevate Compatibility >>>>> >>>>> *check the Release Notes for complete details* >>>>> >>>>> - *Loco M5 XW* >>>>> - *Loco M5 XM* >>>>> - *NanoStation M5 XW* >>>>> - *NanoStation M5 XM* >>>>> - *NanoBridge M5 XM* >>>>> - *Rocket M5 XM* >>>>> - *Rocket M5 XW* >>>>> - *Powerbeam M5 XW* >>>>> - *Airgrid M5HP XW* >>>>> - *Airgrid M5 XM* >>>>> - *NanoBeam M5 XW* >>>>> >>>>> ePMP Elevate DevelopmentsRELEASE 1.0 - NOW AVAILABLE >>>>> >>>>> - XM + XW model >>>>> - Rocket M5 support as a SM - Dec 28, 2016 >>>>> >>>>> RELEASE 2.0 - END OF Q1 2017 >>>>> >>>>> - MikroTik Support - Alpha engagement in Q4, 2016 >>>>> - RB911G5HPnDQRT >>>>> - RBSXT5nDr2 >>>>> - RB912UAG5HPnDOT >>>>> >>>>> 2.4 XW + XM MODELS - END OF Q1, 2017DELIBERANT SUPPORT - Q2, 2017 >>>>> >>>>> Jason Wilson >>>>> Remotely Located >>>>> Providing High Speed Internet to out of the way places. >>>>> 530-651-1736 <%28530%29%20651-1736> >>>>> 530-748-9608 <%28530%29%20748-9608> Cell >>>>> www.remotelylocated.com >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Stefan Englhardt <s...@genias.net> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Does this work for 11ac Mikrotiks ;-)) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *Von:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *Im Auftrag von *Jason Wilson >>>>> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 17:03 >>>>> *An:* af@afmug.com >>>>> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! >>>>> >>>>> I tuned in to the last half of the webinar, Mikrotik is down the road, >>>>> BUT is in the works. From a 100% Mikrotik network that is a time/cash >>>>> saver. >>>>> >>>>> Jason Wilson >>>>> Remotely Located >>>>> Providing High Speed Internet to out of the way places. >>>>> 530-651-1736 <%28530%29%20651-1736> >>>>> 530-748-9608 <%28530%29%20748-9608> Cell >>>>> www.remotelylocated.com >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Jason Wilson < >>>>> ja...@remotelylocated.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Mikrotik? >>>>> >>>>> On Nov 30, 2016 7:31 AM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < >>>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> we have been installing epmp SMs to ubnt backhauls on small sites by >>>>> shutting off airmax until we get a chance to get EPMP APs at the site, >>>>> this >>>>> might give us a better window >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Compatible doesn't mean "same". Software for an Intel 386 is >>>>> compatible with an Intel Core isn't it? >>>>> >>>>> Point taken though...ePMP is still 802.11n. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------ Original Message ------ >>>>> From: "Stefan Englhardt" <s...@genias.net> >>>>> To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> >>>>> Sent: 11/30/2016 10:25:23 AM >>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> They found out that their new ePMP CPEs use the same hardware as the >>>>> oldest UBNT-Atheros-Crap. So no porting problem. Just install the same SW. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *Von:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *Im Auftrag von *That One Guy >>>>> /sarcasm >>>>> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 16:12 >>>>> *An:* af@afmug.com >>>>> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! >>>>> >>>>> you have to wonder if at some point cambium hired marsellus wallace >>>>> and some hard, pipe-hittin' people, who'll go to work on the ubnt >>>>> managers here with a pair of pliers and a blow torch to get hardware >>>>> access >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:05 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> im in the webinar, I didnt realize thats what the webinar was when I >>>>> signed up for it but now im all giddy like a school girl >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Joe Novak <jno...@lrcomm.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I prefer the Cambium direct link: http://www.cambiumnetwor >>>>> ks.com/blog/dont-migrate---elevate/ >>>>> >>>>> Very interesting indeed... very interesting. >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Tyler Treat < >>>>> tyler.tr...@cornbelttech.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> This ought to shake things up a bit. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/> >>>>> >>>>> / <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/> >>>>> >>>>> www.businesswire.com >>>>> >>>>> / >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> > > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.