True, but it's not like UBNT has had real working PTP sync on anything other than the airfiber line... I'm pretty sure those guys know what they're doing, so I expect it'll work like it should.
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 1:35 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > ptp sync and ptmp sync are two totally different animals > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Kurt Fankhauser <lists.wavel...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> its not out yet so we will see, but I would assume it works flawless once >> it gets here because it works fine on airfiber PTP and its based on the >> same platform >> >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 2:24 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> does the airfiber ptmp have functional sync that actually syncs, or just >>> sync like titanium had sync? >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Kurt Fankhauser < >>> lists.wavel...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hopefulyl UBNT will step up their game now, its crucial to keeping >>>> prices low that there is strong competition among venders. I am hoping the >>>> Airfiber PTMP comes out soon so that this will beat Cambium back on price >>>> with the 450 line which is sucking my wallet dry everyday. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 1:15 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> the jist of it is like when Jesus turned water into wine, only now >>>>> jesus is cambium, but he wants 35 bucks for the wine >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Justin Wilson <li...@mtin.net> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> http://www.mtin.net/blog/?p=1442 >>>>>> Some Cliff Notes >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Justin Wilson >>>>>> j...@mtin.net >>>>>> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> http://www.mtin.net Owner/CEO >>>>>> xISP Solutions- Consulting – Data Centers - Bandwidth >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.midwest-ix.com COO/Chairman >>>>>> Internet Exchange - Peering - Distributed Fabric >>>>>> >>>>>> On Nov 30, 2016, at 12:47 PM, Dennis Burgess <dmburg...@linktechs.net> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Someone want to write up the entire thing? What it is etc? how it >>>>>> works vs having us all listen to a webinar :? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *Dennis Burgess** –** Network Solution Engineer – Consultant * >>>>>> MikroTik Certified Trainer/Consultant >>>>>> <http://www.linktechs.net/productcart/pc/viewcontent.asp?idpage=5> – >>>>>> MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE >>>>>> >>>>>> For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net >>>>>> Radio Frequiency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com >>>>>> Office: 314-735-0270 <(314)%20735-0270> >>>>>> E-Mail: dmburg...@linktechs.net >>>>>> >>>>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On >>>>>> Behalf Of *Steve D >>>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 30, 2016 11:28 AM >>>>>> *To:* af <af@afmug.com> >>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! >>>>>> >>>>>> What, you mean they didn't just change the 5's to 3's in the GUI? >>>>>> >>>>>> Learn something new everyday. :p >>>>>> >>>>>> -Steve D >>>>>> >>>>>> On Nov 30, 2016 8:41 AM, "Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> There are probably hardware filters on the RF side. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> bp >>>>>> >>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 11/30/2016 8:35 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> so I have a technical question. The m365 gear is ssupposed to be >>>>>> downconverted 5ghz, is that a software downconvert? (FCC ID issues aside) >>>>>> If thats the case could this be loaded onto m365 to turn it into epmp >>>>>> 5ghz? >>>>>> I assume the downconvert is more than a software load, but man, I >>>>>> literally >>>>>> would make a very inappropriate mess if I could dump the ubnt 3ghz >>>>>> network >>>>>> into epmp in one move >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> 25% is what I remember. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ------ Original Message ------ >>>>>> From: "Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com> >>>>>> To: af@afmug.com >>>>>> Sent: 11/30/2016 11:29:32 AM >>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> That's a very interesting point. I don't think their margins are that >>>>>> low though. They've done what, 40mil units sold? I think that was the >>>>>> last >>>>>> number I heard. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Nov 30, 2016 10:27 AM, "Kurt Fankhauser" <lists.wavel...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> If Ubiquitis margins were low then Cambium could very well end up >>>>>> making more money on a radio that Ubiquiti engineered, manufactures, and >>>>>> delivered. Lol >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:24 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>>>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> This is capitalism in its finest form. Cambium just upped the bar >>>>>> substantially. The market had a very serious issue, and they solved it, >>>>>> while still generating substantial revenue. Im curious what their profit >>>>>> per hardware unit sold is compared to the profit per license, with no >>>>>> real >>>>>> liability. Hopefully this will force ubnt to really focus efforts on real >>>>>> sync that actually works and get an actual legitimate support channel. Or >>>>>> even better, sell their radios preloaded with the EPMP load and work out >>>>>> a >>>>>> discount for AP licenses through them for their customers. Mikrotik I >>>>>> assume is just saying "meh, our products are good" >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Kurt Fankhauser < >>>>>> lists.wavel...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> This is pretty neat with the whole Mikrotik thing, basically you can >>>>>> run a Mikrotik CPE network and be GPS synchronized then... >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Jason Wilson < >>>>>> ja...@remotelylocated.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> ePMP Elevate Compatibility >>>>>> >>>>>> *check the Release Notes for complete details* >>>>>> >>>>>> - *Loco M5 XW* >>>>>> - *Loco M5 XM* >>>>>> - *NanoStation M5 XW* >>>>>> - *NanoStation M5 XM* >>>>>> - *NanoBridge M5 XM* >>>>>> - *Rocket M5 XM* >>>>>> - *Rocket M5 XW* >>>>>> - *Powerbeam M5 XW* >>>>>> - *Airgrid M5HP XW* >>>>>> - *Airgrid M5 XM* >>>>>> - *NanoBeam M5 XW* >>>>>> >>>>>> ePMP Elevate DevelopmentsRELEASE 1.0 - NOW AVAILABLE >>>>>> >>>>>> - XM + XW model >>>>>> - Rocket M5 support as a SM - Dec 28, 2016 >>>>>> >>>>>> RELEASE 2.0 - END OF Q1 2017 >>>>>> >>>>>> - MikroTik Support - Alpha engagement in Q4, 2016 >>>>>> - RB911G5HPnDQRT >>>>>> - RBSXT5nDr2 >>>>>> - RB912UAG5HPnDOT >>>>>> >>>>>> 2.4 XW + XM MODELS - END OF Q1, 2017DELIBERANT SUPPORT - Q2, 2017 >>>>>> >>>>>> Jason Wilson >>>>>> Remotely Located >>>>>> Providing High Speed Internet to out of the way places. >>>>>> 530-651-1736 <%28530%29%20651-1736> >>>>>> 530-748-9608 <%28530%29%20748-9608> Cell >>>>>> www.remotelylocated.com >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Stefan Englhardt <s...@genias.net> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Does this work for 11ac Mikrotiks ;-)) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *Von:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *Im Auftrag von *Jason Wilson >>>>>> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 17:03 >>>>>> *An:* af@afmug.com >>>>>> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! >>>>>> >>>>>> I tuned in to the last half of the webinar, Mikrotik is down the >>>>>> road, BUT is in the works. From a 100% Mikrotik network that is a >>>>>> time/cash saver. >>>>>> >>>>>> Jason Wilson >>>>>> Remotely Located >>>>>> Providing High Speed Internet to out of the way places. >>>>>> 530-651-1736 <%28530%29%20651-1736> >>>>>> 530-748-9608 <%28530%29%20748-9608> Cell >>>>>> www.remotelylocated.com >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Jason Wilson < >>>>>> ja...@remotelylocated.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Mikrotik? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Nov 30, 2016 7:31 AM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < >>>>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> we have been installing epmp SMs to ubnt backhauls on small sites by >>>>>> shutting off airmax until we get a chance to get EPMP APs at the site, >>>>>> this >>>>>> might give us a better window >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Compatible doesn't mean "same". Software for an Intel 386 is >>>>>> compatible with an Intel Core isn't it? >>>>>> >>>>>> Point taken though...ePMP is still 802.11n. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ------ Original Message ------ >>>>>> From: "Stefan Englhardt" <s...@genias.net> >>>>>> To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> >>>>>> Sent: 11/30/2016 10:25:23 AM >>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> They found out that their new ePMP CPEs use the same hardware as the >>>>>> oldest UBNT-Atheros-Crap. So no porting problem. Just install the same >>>>>> SW. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *Von:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *Im Auftrag von *That One >>>>>> Guy /sarcasm >>>>>> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 16:12 >>>>>> *An:* af@afmug.com >>>>>> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! >>>>>> >>>>>> you have to wonder if at some point cambium hired marsellus wallace >>>>>> and some hard, pipe-hittin' people, who'll go to work on the ubnt >>>>>> managers here with a pair of pliers and a blow torch to get hardware >>>>>> access >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:05 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>>>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> im in the webinar, I didnt realize thats what the webinar was when I >>>>>> signed up for it but now im all giddy like a school girl >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Joe Novak <jno...@lrcomm.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I prefer the Cambium direct link: http://www.cambiumnetwor >>>>>> ks.com/blog/dont-migrate---elevate/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Very interesting indeed... very interesting. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Tyler Treat < >>>>>> tyler.tr...@cornbelttech.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> This ought to shake things up a bit. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/> >>>>>> >>>>>> / <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/> >>>>>> >>>>>> www.businesswire.com >>>>>> >>>>>> / >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >> >> > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >
