No. On Nov 30, 2016 12:41 PM, "Mike Hammett" <af...@ics-il.net> wrote:
> Just watch it. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Dennis Burgess" <dmburg...@linktechs.net> > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Wednesday, November 30, 2016 11:47:10 AM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! > > Someone want to write up the entire thing? What it is etc? how it works > vs having us all listen to a webinar :? > > > > > > *Dennis Burgess** –** Network Solution Engineer – Consultant * > > MikroTik Certified Trainer/Consultant > <http://www.linktechs.net/productcart/pc/viewcontent.asp?idpage=5> – > MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE > > > > For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net > > Radio Frequiency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com > > Office: 314-735-0270 <(314)%20735-0270> > > E-Mail: dmburg...@linktechs.net > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Steve D > *Sent:* Wednesday, November 30, 2016 11:28 AM > *To:* af <af@afmug.com> > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! > > > > What, you mean they didn't just change the 5's to 3's in the GUI? > > > > Learn something new everyday. :p > > > > -Steve D > > > > On Nov 30, 2016 8:41 AM, "Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com> wrote: > > There are probably hardware filters on the RF side. > > > > bp > > <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > > > > On 11/30/2016 8:35 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: > > so I have a technical question. The m365 gear is ssupposed to be > downconverted 5ghz, is that a software downconvert? (FCC ID issues aside) > If thats the case could this be loaded onto m365 to turn it into epmp 5ghz? > I assume the downconvert is more than a software load, but man, I literally > would make a very inappropriate mess if I could dump the ubnt 3ghz network > into epmp in one move > > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > 25% is what I remember. > > > > > > ------ Original Message ------ > > From: "Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com> > > To: af@afmug.com > > Sent: 11/30/2016 11:29:32 AM > > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! > > > > That's a very interesting point. I don't think their margins are that low > though. They've done what, 40mil units sold? I think that was the last > number I heard. > > > > On Nov 30, 2016 10:27 AM, "Kurt Fankhauser" <lists.wavel...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > If Ubiquitis margins were low then Cambium could very well end up making > more money on a radio that Ubiquiti engineered, manufactures, and > delivered. Lol > > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:24 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < > thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > This is capitalism in its finest form. Cambium just upped the bar > substantially. The market had a very serious issue, and they solved it, > while still generating substantial revenue. Im curious what their profit > per hardware unit sold is compared to the profit per license, with no real > liability. Hopefully this will force ubnt to really focus efforts on real > sync that actually works and get an actual legitimate support channel. Or > even better, sell their radios preloaded with the EPMP load and work out a > discount for AP licenses through them for their customers. Mikrotik I > assume is just saying "meh, our products are good" > > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Kurt Fankhauser < > lists.wavel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > This is pretty neat with the whole Mikrotik thing, basically you can run a > Mikrotik CPE network and be GPS synchronized then... > > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Jason Wilson <ja...@remotelylocated.com> > wrote: > > ePMP Elevate Compatibility > > *check the Release Notes for complete details* > > - *Loco M5 XW* > - *Loco M5 XM* > - *NanoStation M5 XW* > - *NanoStation M5 XM* > - *NanoBridge M5 XM* > - *Rocket M5 XM* > - *Rocket M5 XW* > - *Powerbeam M5 XW* > - *Airgrid M5HP XW* > - *Airgrid M5 XM* > - *NanoBeam M5 XW* > > ePMP Elevate Developments RELEASE 1.0 - NOW AVAILABLE > > - XM + XW model > - Rocket M5 support as a SM - Dec 28, 2016 > > RELEASE 2.0 - END OF Q1 2017 > > - MikroTik Support - Alpha engagement in Q4, 2016 > - RB911G5HPnDQRT > - RBSXT5nDr2 > - RB912UAG5HPnDOT > > 2.4 XW + XM MODELS - END OF Q1, 2017 DELIBERANT SUPPORT - Q2, 2017 > > > Jason Wilson > > Remotely Located > > Providing High Speed Internet to out of the way places. > > 530-651-1736 <%28530%29%20651-1736> > > 530-748-9608 <%28530%29%20748-9608> Cell > > www.remotelylocated.com > > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Stefan Englhardt <s...@genias.net> wrote: > > Does this work for 11ac Mikrotiks ;-)) > > > > > > *Von:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *Im Auftrag von *Jason Wilson > *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 17:03 > *An:* af@afmug.com > *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! > > > > I tuned in to the last half of the webinar, Mikrotik is down the road, BUT > is in the works. From a 100% Mikrotik network that is a time/cash saver. > > > Jason Wilson > > Remotely Located > > Providing High Speed Internet to out of the way places. > > 530-651-1736 <%28530%29%20651-1736> > > 530-748-9608 <%28530%29%20748-9608> Cell > > www.remotelylocated.com > > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Jason Wilson <ja...@remotelylocated.com> > wrote: > > Mikrotik? > > > > On Nov 30, 2016 7:31 AM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < > thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > we have been installing epmp SMs to ubnt backhauls on small sites by > shutting off airmax until we get a chance to get EPMP APs at the site, this > might give us a better window > > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Compatible doesn't mean "same". Software for an Intel 386 is compatible > with an Intel Core isn't it? > > > > Point taken though...ePMP is still 802.11n. > > > > > > ------ Original Message ------ > > From: "Stefan Englhardt" <s...@genias.net> > > To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> > > Sent: 11/30/2016 10:25:23 AM > > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! > > > > They found out that their new ePMP CPEs use the same hardware as the > oldest UBNT-Atheros-Crap. So no porting problem. Just install the same SW. > > > > > > *Von:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *Im Auftrag von *That One Guy > /sarcasm > *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 16:12 > *An:* af@afmug.com > *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! > > > > you have to wonder if at some point cambium hired marsellus wallace and > some hard, pipe-hittin' people, who'll go to work on the ubnt managers > here with a pair of pliers and a blow torch to get hardware access > > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:05 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < > thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > im in the webinar, I didnt realize thats what the webinar was when I > signed up for it but now im all giddy like a school girl > > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Joe Novak <jno...@lrcomm.com> wrote: > > I prefer the Cambium direct link: http://www. > cambiumnetworks.com/blog/dont-migrate---elevate/ > > > > Very interesting indeed... very interesting. > > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Tyler Treat <tyler.tr...@cornbelttech.com> > wrote: > > This ought to shake things up a bit. > > > > http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/ > > > > <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/> > > / <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/> > > www.businesswire.com > > / > > > > > > > > > > -- > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > > > -- > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > > > -- > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > > > > > -- > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > >
