3.2.1 was just released... I think it's supposed to fix that. On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> wrote:
> Uhhmm...you're probably going to have DFS issues on 3.x > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340> > Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343> > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 3:03 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Nope. P9 5.7 APs do not support SM Tx power control. We're just going to >> go to an ePMP 2000 AP and pray that we don't have DFS issues on 3.x. >> >> On 1/4/2017 1:37 PM, Dave wrote: >> >> FSK is going to be hard to colo due to the fact you mentioned but you >> should be able to upgrade to fsk latest FW and >> get what u need for ATPC >> Also, Look at you epmp for latest FW for it to also have some more >> control over ATPC >> You also may need to adj the level at which the ATPC will adjust to. >> Being that close I would set it lower from -57 to more like -67 or so and >> do the same for both fsk and epmp. >> >> >> >> On 01/03/2017 02:44 PM, George Skorup wrote: >> >> First time I've tried this. I have a site with two 5750APs. They are >> quite obviously overloading the receiver on the ePMP GPS AP. Put numbers in >> the co-lo spreadsheet, timing checks out. Running the ePMP in the 5.4 band. >> Still works for shit. >> >> This is a very compact micro-pop, so we have SMs within 50-100 feet of >> the tower. I'm betting the SM uplinks are interfering with the ePMP AP. And >> I get no SM Tx power control on the Canopy's because the APs are P9's. >> Probably gonna have to go to an ePMP 2000 AP. Ugh. I would put 450 there, >> but the boss said no, the SMs are too expensive. >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >
