Sri said it fixed type1 and type5 DFS events (no idea what that means).
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 4:07 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> wrote: > Saw that. Hope it works. > > On 1/4/2017 2:09 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: > > 3.2.1 was just released... I think it's supposed to fix that. > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Uhhmm...you're probably going to have DFS issues on 3.x >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 <%28937%29%20552-2340> >> Direct: 937-552-2343 <%28937%29%20552-2343> >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 3:03 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Nope. P9 5.7 APs do not support SM Tx power control. We're just going to >>> go to an ePMP 2000 AP and pray that we don't have DFS issues on 3.x. >>> >>> On 1/4/2017 1:37 PM, Dave wrote: >>> >>> FSK is going to be hard to colo due to the fact you mentioned but you >>> should be able to upgrade to fsk latest FW and >>> get what u need for ATPC >>> Also, Look at you epmp for latest FW for it to also have some more >>> control over ATPC >>> You also may need to adj the level at which the ATPC will adjust to. >>> Being that close I would set it lower from -57 to more like -67 or so >>> and do the same for both fsk and epmp. >>> >>> >>> >>> On 01/03/2017 02:44 PM, George Skorup wrote: >>> >>> First time I've tried this. I have a site with two 5750APs. They are >>> quite obviously overloading the receiver on the ePMP GPS AP. Put numbers in >>> the co-lo spreadsheet, timing checks out. Running the ePMP in the 5.4 band. >>> Still works for shit. >>> >>> This is a very compact micro-pop, so we have SMs within 50-100 feet of >>> the tower. I'm betting the SM uplinks are interfering with the ePMP AP. And >>> I get no SM Tx power control on the Canopy's because the APs are P9's. >>> Probably gonna have to go to an ePMP 2000 AP. Ugh. I would put 450 there, >>> but the boss said no, the SMs are too expensive. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> >> > >
