We "allocate" a /64 to each PtP link, but actually use a /126 (or
/127) mask so packets addressed to the remainder of the /64 simply
get dropped because there is no route in the table. Jesse DuPont Network
Architect Celerity
Broadband LLC Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband On 1/15/17 10:36 AM, Seth Mattinen
wrote:
On 1/15/17 8:55 AM, Justin Wilson wrote: |
- Re: [AFMUG] Best Way to implement dual stac... Ken Hohhof
- Re: [AFMUG] Best Way to implement dual stac... Faisal Imtiaz
- Re: [AFMUG] Best Way to implement dual ... Ken Hohhof
- Re: [AFMUG] Best Way to implement dual ... Chuck McCown
- Re: [AFMUG] Best Way to implement dual stac... Seth Mattinen
- Re: [AFMUG] Best Way to implement dual stac... Mike Hammett
- Re: [AFMUG] Best Way to implement dual stack IPv4/6 Justin Wilson
- Re: [AFMUG] Best Way to implement dual stack IPv4/6 Cassidy B. Larson
- Re: [AFMUG] Best Way to implement dual stack IPv4/6 Seth Mattinen
- Re: [AFMUG] Best Way to implement dual stack IPv4/6 Chris Wright
- Re: [AFMUG] Best Way to implement dual stack IPv4/6 Jesse DuPont
- Re: [AFMUG] Best Way to implement dual stack IPv4/6 Faisal Imtiaz