In a perfect world. On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Kurt Fankhauser <lists.wavel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You shouldn't be putting any clients on a 450AP with less than 4x > connections, when they start pulling a lot of traffic they significantly > choke the AP. Whoever engineered those links needs slapped. I know it > probably looked like a good idea at the time to add a new customer but a > couple low signal clients really affect total AP capacity. You could > probably pull all the 1x and 2x clients and replace them with 10 times more > customers running at 8x mnodulatio n and maintain the same utilization > rates on that AP. > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 9:45 PM, Craig Schmaderer < > cr...@skywaveconnect.com> wrote: > >> Remember that even a couple of sms runing at 2x or 4x will kill your peak >> performance if they are the ones that are usually streaming. We are very >> careful on what aps we put low signals on and we control what plans we >> offer as well based on signal strength. I just can not have a 2x customer >> want a 10mb plan. I do think that a 450i will definitely help with uplink >> interference like others have said. But i think your best bet is to drop >> the cash and put some 450m up on that tower. Sounds like that is a cash >> cow tower like my main tower is. >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Jon Langeler < >> jon-ispli...@michwave.net> >> *Sent:* Thursday, January 19, 2017 4:18:22 PM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450 vs 450i >> >> Put a Mikrotik behind an SM and speed test to the internet >> >> Jon Langeler >> Michwave Technologies, Inc. >> >> >> > On Jan 19, 2017, at 1:08 PM, Brian Sullivan <installe...@foxvalley.net> >> wrote: >> > >> > I would check out page 9-51 in the PMP 450x Configuration and User >> Guide 15.0.2 >> > >> >> On 1/19/2017 11:37 AM, Tushar Patel wrote: >> >> So how can we tell when we are really saturating the connection? >> > >> > >
