He had money, knew to hire the right people, and made good decisions. Historically that's not been common in politics. It's always been mostly 'spenders'
Jon Langeler Michwave Technologies, Inc. > On Jan 22, 2017, at 3:20 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote: > > Net worth is in no way an indicator of intelligence. In fact, it often > happens by accident, or in spite of intelligence. > >> On Jan 22, 2017 2:00 PM, "Jon Langeler" <jon-ispli...@michwave.net> wrote: >> Considering his net worth he might he smarter than any of us. But if your >> looking for miracles you might be better off reading the bible. >> >> Jon Langeler >> Michwave Technologies, Inc. >> >> >>> On Jan 22, 2017, at 2:55 PM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Empty promises just like his brain. But it's okay to grope now.... >>> Waiting for right time to do it comrades >>> >>>> On Jan 22, 2017 10:38 AM, "Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote: >>>> https://streamable.com/md28v >>>> >>>> I still cannot settle down with the idea that a Trump presidency is not >>>> some kind of joke taken too far... >>>> >>>>> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Jaime Solorza >>>>> <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> Waiting on Tweets Trump or Trumps Tweet response to this.. >>>>> https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fm.huffpost.com%2Fus%2Fentry%2Fus_5884a06be4b096b4a2325818%2Famp#pt0-568751 >>>>> >>>>>> On Jan 22, 2017 7:40 AM, "Jaime Solorza" <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Hey but you can buy Melanias jewelry line on new white house website. >>>>>> The bullshit is going to get worse...no million and half attended >>>>>> inauguration.... Women's March had a lot more... His ego is bruised. >>>>>> Let me Trumpspeak... So sad. >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Jan 22, 2017 12:47 AM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" >>>>>>> <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> there is this gem now >>>>>>> http://www.hewillnotdivide.us/ >>>>>>> 24x7 real time stream of people being idiots ala transformers guy >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Stefan Englhardt <s...@genias.net> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Today we’ve great possibilities to spread news. But it is very >>>>>>>> difficult to get the real information unbiased. Breitbart is known to >>>>>>>> be very biased even here over the ocean. But it seems the „normal“ >>>>>>>> media in USA is biased, too. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> E.g. we never understood how Bush jun. got his second election where >>>>>>>> it was clear he started a war based on wrong information. This is >>>>>>>> unthinkable here. It would be the one point which would dominate the >>>>>>>> discussion and would make him unvotable here. Your media seemed to >>>>>>>> move the discussion away from this fact and relativated his guilty to >>>>>>>> make him votable. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Another example is the Hillary Email discussion. This is a topic which >>>>>>>> is minor at best but was discussed the whole time. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I guess it is possible Trump kills a person in TV and get reelected if >>>>>>>> media helps him. Unthinkable? But killing one person is much less a >>>>>>>> problem than starting a war where thousands are killed. Breitbart >>>>>>>> would find 100 reasons why this person has to die and would find other >>>>>>>> topics to report. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Good and neutral media are the base of a working democracy. For sure >>>>>>>> you have a problem. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Von: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] Im Auftrag von That One Guy >>>>>>>> /sarcasm >>>>>>>> Gesendet: Sonntag, 22. Januar 2017 07:05 >>>>>>>> An: af@afmug.com >>>>>>>> Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Im pretty confident the next few days is setting the stage to >>>>>>>> effectively shutting down "media access". Im all for it in the current >>>>>>>> environment. Between press releases, Publicly accessible data, FOIA >>>>>>>> responses, live streamed events, and one on one interviews (and >>>>>>>> yes...twitter) the press really is the dialup internet method of >>>>>>>> getting information. We know more in real time then the press could >>>>>>>> ever package up and present. The current mindset of media in press >>>>>>>> conferences is that of militants (both sides of the media isle) and >>>>>>>> there is zero professionalism from either one. Neither really gives a >>>>>>>> damn what the answer is anyway, theyre going to report whatever their >>>>>>>> preconceived response was either way. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Question: Did we send B52 Bombers to hit an ISIS target? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Answer: Yes >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> CNN under Obama: Obama authorizes successful airstrike removing 100 >>>>>>>> ISIS fighters in final days of his presidency. This act ensures that >>>>>>>> those who would commit terror will be addressed accordingly, even >>>>>>>> during the transition of power. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Breitbart under Obama: Obama, the snake furthers military conflict day >>>>>>>> before leaving office, leaving all Americans at risk during a >>>>>>>> tumultuous time of transition. Kills 100, ensuring a retaliatory >>>>>>>> response. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Had the same attack been authorized today: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> CNN under Trump: MILITARY FIASCO: Trump bombs random targets. Top >>>>>>>> military officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, refuse to >>>>>>>> verify there were no civilian casualties, at least 100 confirmed dead. >>>>>>>> War crime charges possible? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Breitbart under Trump: God Emperor Trump authorized the removal of >>>>>>>> 100 ISIS top leaders in his first act as Commander in Chief. Rumors of >>>>>>>> ISIS surrender. Barack Obama potentially one of the dead operatives. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 11:45 PM, Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm all for it. I think that everyone is probably just impressed by >>>>>>>> the first white house press briefing and the remarks at Langley. What >>>>>>>> an amazing public speaker this one is. Have you ever had a friend or >>>>>>>> friend's uncle or something who did too much meth? You know how they >>>>>>>> start out with one sentence and then before you know it they have told >>>>>>>> fifteen other stories before they ever get to the point...if they ever >>>>>>>> do??? We have four years of that to look forward to. Just watch the >>>>>>>> full speech at the CIA, you will see what I mean. Or don't....save >>>>>>>> yourself the pain. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Can we talk about politics yet? :P >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
