Trump cheated on his first wife for what became his second. On Jan 22, 2017 4:57 PM, "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
> Clintons had JFK knocked off too... > > On a more serious note, Bill was very effective in suppressing and > containing his bimbo eruption of rapes etc. > Does anyone doubt he did those things too? > > Who has raped more women? > Bill Cosby > Bill Clinton > Donald Trump > > If we throw some kind of standard of morality at a president then it > better be applied equally to all of them. I seriously doubt Jimmy Carter > cheated on his wife. How about JFK? > > I have a standard I apply to business associates: you cheat on our spouse > you will cheat me too. > > *From:* Josh Reynolds > *Sent:* Sunday, January 22, 2017 3:50 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we? > > Have you ever looked at the list of people killed who were involved in > some way with the JFK assassination? > > On Jan 22, 2017 4:34 PM, "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > > One thing is for certain, absolute inarguable fact, these 63 people are as > dead as you can get and all of them either spilled the beans on the > Clintons or had information that could harm the Clintons. > > So, if you want to talk ethics and morals of Trump, I have not yet heard > of anyone he had whacked. Maybe he is just better at doing it. > > 1. Susan Coleman: > 2. Larry Guerrin: > 3. Kevin Ives > 4. Don Henry: > 5. Keith Coney: > 6. Keith McKaskle: > 7. Gregory Collins: > 8. Jeff Rhodes: > 9. James Milam: > 10. Richard Winters: > 11. Jordan Kettleson: > 12. Alan Standorf: > 13. Dennis Eisman: . > 14. Danny Casalaro: > 15. Victor Raiser: > 16. R. Montgomery Raiser: > 17. Paul Tully: > 18. Ian Spiro: > 19. Paula Gober: > 20. Jim Wilhite: > 21. Steve Willis, > 22. Robert Williams, > 23. Todd McKeahan > 24. Conway LeBleu: > 25. Sgt. Brian Haney, > 26. Sgt. Tim Sabel, > 27. Maj. William Barkley, > 28. Capt. Scott Reynolds: > 29. John Crawford: > 30. John Wilson: > 31. Paul Wilcher: > 32. Vincent Foster: > 33. Jon Parnell Walker: > 34. Stanley Heard > 35. Steven Dickson: > 36. Jerry Luther Parks: > 37. Ed Willey: > 38. Gandy Baugh: > 39. Herschell Friday: > 40. Ronald Rogers: > 41. Kathy Furguson: > 42. Bill Shelton: > 43. Stanley Huggins: > 44. Paul Olson: > 45. Calvin Walraven: > 46. Alan G. Whicher: > 47. Duane Garrett: > 48. Ron Brown:. > 49. Charles Meissner: > 50. William Colby: > 51. Admiral Jeremy Boorda: > 52. Lance Herndon: > 53. Neil Moody: > 54. Barbara Wise: > 55. Doug Adams: > 56. Mary C. Mahoney: > 57. Ronald Miller: > 58. Sandy Hume: > 59. Jim McDougal: > 60. Johnny Lawhon: > 61. Charles Wilbourne Miller: > 62. Carlos Ghigliotti: > 63. Tony Moser: > > > From: Josh Reynolds > Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2017 2:41 PM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we? > > He also ran a lot of less than ethical schemes to make his money. Some > were legal, some were not. You may consider that smart, and that's your > right. I do not. > > On Jan 22, 2017 2:53 PM, "Jon Langeler" <jon-ispli...@michwave.net> wrote: > > He had money, knew to hire the right people, and made good decisions. > Historically that's not been common in politics. It's always been mostly > 'spenders' > > > Jon Langeler > Michwave Technologies, Inc. > > > On Jan 22, 2017, at 3:20 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote: > > > Net worth is in no way an indicator of intelligence. In fact, it often > happens by accident, or in spite of intelligence. > > On Jan 22, 2017 2:00 PM, "Jon Langeler" <jon-ispli...@michwave.net> wrote: > > Considering his net worth he might he smarter than any of us. But if your > looking for miracles you might be better off reading the bible. > > > Jon Langeler > Michwave Technologies, Inc. > > > On Jan 22, 2017, at 2:55 PM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Empty promises just like his brain. But it's okay to grope now.... > Waiting for right time to do it comrades > > On Jan 22, 2017 10:38 AM, "Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote: > > https://streamable.com/md28v > > I still cannot settle down with the idea that a Trump presidency is not > some kind of joke taken too far... > > On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Waiting on Tweets Trump or Trumps Tweet response to this.. > https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fm.huffpo > st.com%2Fus%2Fentry%2Fus_5884a06be4b096b4a2325818%2Famp#pt0-568751 > > On Jan 22, 2017 7:40 AM, "Jaime Solorza" <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hey but you can buy Melanias jewelry line on new white house website. The > bullshit is going to get worse...no million and half attended > inauguration.... Women's March had a lot more... His ego is bruised. Let > me Trumpspeak... So sad. > > On Jan 22, 2017 12:47 AM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < > thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > there is this gem now > http://www.hewillnotdivide.us/ > 24x7 real time stream of people being idiots ala transformers guy > > On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Stefan Englhardt <s...@genias.net> wrote: > > > Today we’ve great possibilities to spread news. But it is very difficult > to get the real information unbiased. Breitbart is known to be very biased > even here over the ocean. But it seems the „normal“ media in USA is biased, > too. > > E.g. we never understood how Bush jun. got his second election where it > was clear he started a war based on wrong information. This is unthinkable > here. It would be the one point which would dominate the discussion and > would make him unvotable here. Your media seemed to move the discussion > away from this fact and relativated his guilty to make him votable. > > Another example is the Hillary Email discussion. This is a topic which is > minor at best but was discussed the whole time. > > I guess it is possible Trump kills a person in TV and get reelected if > media helps him. Unthinkable? But killing one person is much less a problem > than starting a war where thousands are killed. Breitbart would find 100 > reasons why this person has to die and would find other topics to report. > > > > > > Good and neutral media are the base of a working democracy. For sure you > have a problem. > > > > > > > > > > Von: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] Im Auftrag von That One Guy /sarcasm > Gesendet: Sonntag, 22. Januar 2017 07:05 > An: af@afmug.com > Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we? > > > > > > > > Im pretty confident the next few days is setting the stage to effectively > shutting down "media access". Im all for it in the current environment. > Between press releases, Publicly accessible data, FOIA responses, live > streamed events, and one on one interviews (and yes...twitter) the press > really is the dialup internet method of getting information. We know more > in real time then the press could ever package up and present. The current > mindset of media in press conferences is that of militants (both sides of > the media isle) and there is zero professionalism from either one. Neither > really gives a damn what the answer is anyway, theyre going to report > whatever their preconceived response was either way. > > > > > > > > Question: Did we send B52 Bombers to hit an ISIS target? > > > > > > > > Answer: Yes > > > > > > > > CNN under Obama: Obama authorizes successful airstrike removing 100 ISIS > fighters in final days of his presidency. This act ensures that those who > would commit terror will be addressed accordingly, even during the > transition of power. > > > > > > > > Breitbart under Obama: Obama, the snake furthers military conflict day > before leaving office, leaving all Americans at risk during a tumultuous > time of transition. Kills 100, ensuring a retaliatory response. > > > > > > > > Had the same attack been authorized today: > > > > > > > > CNN under Trump: MILITARY FIASCO: Trump bombs random targets. Top military > officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, refuse to verify there were > no civilian casualties, at least 100 confirmed dead. War crime charges > possible? > > > > > > > > Breitbart under Trump: God Emperor Trump authorized the removal of 100 > ISIS top leaders in his first act as Commander in Chief. Rumors of ISIS > surrender. Barack Obama potentially one of the dead operatives. > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 11:45 PM, Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I'm all for it. I think that everyone is probably just impressed by the > first white house press briefing and the remarks at Langley. What an > amazing public speaker this one is. Have you ever had a friend or friend's > uncle or something who did too much meth? You know how they start out with > one sentence and then before you know it they have told fifteen other > stories before they ever get to the point...if they ever do??? We have > four years of that to look forward to. Just watch the full speech at the > CIA, you will see what I mean. Or don't....save yourself the pain. > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> > wrote: > > > > Can we talk about politics yet? :P > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > > > > -- > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > > > > > > > > >
