I honestly cannot believe at all why any human being would think that at this point. I feel like we don't live not only in the same country, but on a completely different planet. And this is coming from someone who has never lived on either coast, and has spent time in the military as well as living a mostly rural life in Kentucky, Indiana, Arizona, Alaska, and Missouri.
On Jan 22, 2017 8:47 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > just fyi if jaime gets knocked off the list, im taking my toys and going > home > > in 4 years hes going to be showing us pictures of tecate and some insanely > tasty looking crow anyway :-) > > > On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I don't buy that... Respect your opinion but I don't buy that 63 list... >> >> I have no confidence in Trump... I think he is bad for our country... I >> will not change my mind. If you want to knock me off list... It's cool... >> I have always remained true to my beliefs. My last post on this one... >> >> On Jan 22, 2017 3:50 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote: >> >> Have you ever looked at the list of people killed who were involved in >> some way with the JFK assassination? >> >> On Jan 22, 2017 4:34 PM, "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: >> >> One thing is for certain, absolute inarguable fact, these 63 people are >> as dead as you can get and all of them either spilled the beans on the >> Clintons or had information that could harm the Clintons. >> >> So, if you want to talk ethics and morals of Trump, I have not yet heard >> of anyone he had whacked. Maybe he is just better at doing it. >> >> 1. Susan Coleman: >> 2. Larry Guerrin: >> 3. Kevin Ives >> 4. Don Henry: >> 5. Keith Coney: >> 6. Keith McKaskle: >> 7. Gregory Collins: >> 8. Jeff Rhodes: >> 9. James Milam: >> 10. Richard Winters: >> 11. Jordan Kettleson: >> 12. Alan Standorf: >> 13. Dennis Eisman: . >> 14. Danny Casalaro: >> 15. Victor Raiser: >> 16. R. Montgomery Raiser: >> 17. Paul Tully: >> 18. Ian Spiro: >> 19. Paula Gober: >> 20. Jim Wilhite: >> 21. Steve Willis, >> 22. Robert Williams, >> 23. Todd McKeahan >> 24. Conway LeBleu: >> 25. Sgt. Brian Haney, >> 26. Sgt. Tim Sabel, >> 27. Maj. William Barkley, >> 28. Capt. Scott Reynolds: >> 29. John Crawford: >> 30. John Wilson: >> 31. Paul Wilcher: >> 32. Vincent Foster: >> 33. Jon Parnell Walker: >> 34. Stanley Heard >> 35. Steven Dickson: >> 36. Jerry Luther Parks: >> 37. Ed Willey: >> 38. Gandy Baugh: >> 39. Herschell Friday: >> 40. Ronald Rogers: >> 41. Kathy Furguson: >> 42. Bill Shelton: >> 43. Stanley Huggins: >> 44. Paul Olson: >> 45. Calvin Walraven: >> 46. Alan G. Whicher: >> 47. Duane Garrett: >> 48. Ron Brown:. >> 49. Charles Meissner: >> 50. William Colby: >> 51. Admiral Jeremy Boorda: >> 52. Lance Herndon: >> 53. Neil Moody: >> 54. Barbara Wise: >> 55. Doug Adams: >> 56. Mary C. Mahoney: >> 57. Ronald Miller: >> 58. Sandy Hume: >> 59. Jim McDougal: >> 60. Johnny Lawhon: >> 61. Charles Wilbourne Miller: >> 62. Carlos Ghigliotti: >> 63. Tony Moser: >> >> >> From: Josh Reynolds >> Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2017 2:41 PM >> To: af@afmug.com >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we? >> >> He also ran a lot of less than ethical schemes to make his money. Some >> were legal, some were not. You may consider that smart, and that's your >> right. I do not. >> >> On Jan 22, 2017 2:53 PM, "Jon Langeler" <jon-ispli...@michwave.net> >> wrote: >> >> He had money, knew to hire the right people, and made good decisions. >> Historically that's not been common in politics. It's always been mostly >> 'spenders' >> >> >> Jon Langeler >> Michwave Technologies, Inc. >> >> >> On Jan 22, 2017, at 3:20 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote: >> >> >> Net worth is in no way an indicator of intelligence. In fact, it often >> happens by accident, or in spite of intelligence. >> >> On Jan 22, 2017 2:00 PM, "Jon Langeler" <jon-ispli...@michwave.net> >> wrote: >> >> Considering his net worth he might he smarter than any of us. But if your >> looking for miracles you might be better off reading the bible. >> >> >> Jon Langeler >> Michwave Technologies, Inc. >> >> >> On Jan 22, 2017, at 2:55 PM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> Empty promises just like his brain. But it's okay to grope now.... >> Waiting for right time to do it comrades >> >> On Jan 22, 2017 10:38 AM, "Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote: >> >> https://streamable.com/md28v >> >> I still cannot settle down with the idea that a Trump presidency is not >> some kind of joke taken too far... >> >> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Waiting on Tweets Trump or Trumps Tweet response to this.. >> https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fm.huffpo >> st.com%2Fus%2Fentry%2Fus_5884a06be4b096b4a2325818%2Famp#pt0-568751 >> >> On Jan 22, 2017 7:40 AM, "Jaime Solorza" <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Hey but you can buy Melanias jewelry line on new white house website. The >> bullshit is going to get worse...no million and half attended >> inauguration.... Women's March had a lot more... His ego is bruised. Let >> me Trumpspeak... So sad. >> >> On Jan 22, 2017 12:47 AM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < >> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> there is this gem now >> http://www.hewillnotdivide.us/ >> 24x7 real time stream of people being idiots ala transformers guy >> >> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Stefan Englhardt <s...@genias.net> wrote: >> >> >> Today we’ve great possibilities to spread news. But it is very difficult >> to get the real information unbiased. Breitbart is known to be very biased >> even here over the ocean. But it seems the „normal“ media in USA is biased, >> too. >> >> E.g. we never understood how Bush jun. got his second election where it >> was clear he started a war based on wrong information. This is unthinkable >> here. It would be the one point which would dominate the discussion and >> would make him unvotable here. Your media seemed to move the discussion >> away from this fact and relativated his guilty to make him votable. >> >> Another example is the Hillary Email discussion. This is a topic which is >> minor at best but was discussed the whole time. >> >> I guess it is possible Trump kills a person in TV and get reelected if >> media helps him. Unthinkable? But killing one person is much less a problem >> than starting a war where thousands are killed. Breitbart would find 100 >> reasons why this person has to die and would find other topics to report. >> >> >> >> >> >> Good and neutral media are the base of a working democracy. For sure you >> have a problem. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Von: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] Im Auftrag von That One Guy >> /sarcasm >> Gesendet: Sonntag, 22. Januar 2017 07:05 >> An: af@afmug.com >> Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Im pretty confident the next few days is setting the stage to effectively >> shutting down "media access". Im all for it in the current environment. >> Between press releases, Publicly accessible data, FOIA responses, live >> streamed events, and one on one interviews (and yes...twitter) the press >> really is the dialup internet method of getting information. We know more >> in real time then the press could ever package up and present. The current >> mindset of media in press conferences is that of militants (both sides of >> the media isle) and there is zero professionalism from either one. Neither >> really gives a damn what the answer is anyway, theyre going to report >> whatever their preconceived response was either way. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Question: Did we send B52 Bombers to hit an ISIS target? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Answer: Yes >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> CNN under Obama: Obama authorizes successful airstrike removing 100 ISIS >> fighters in final days of his presidency. This act ensures that those who >> would commit terror will be addressed accordingly, even during the >> transition of power. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Breitbart under Obama: Obama, the snake furthers military conflict day >> before leaving office, leaving all Americans at risk during a tumultuous >> time of transition. Kills 100, ensuring a retaliatory response. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Had the same attack been authorized today: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> CNN under Trump: MILITARY FIASCO: Trump bombs random targets. Top >> military officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, refuse to verify >> there were no civilian casualties, at least 100 confirmed dead. War crime >> charges possible? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Breitbart under Trump: God Emperor Trump authorized the removal of 100 >> ISIS top leaders in his first act as Commander in Chief. Rumors of ISIS >> surrender. Barack Obama potentially one of the dead operatives. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 11:45 PM, Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> I'm all for it. I think that everyone is probably just impressed by the >> first white house press briefing and the remarks at Langley. What an >> amazing public speaker this one is. Have you ever had a friend or friend's >> uncle or something who did too much meth? You know how they start out with >> one sentence and then before you know it they have told fifteen other >> stories before they ever get to the point...if they ever do??? We have >> four years of that to look forward to. Just watch the full speech at the >> CIA, you will see what I mean. Or don't....save yourself the pain. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Can we talk about politics yet? :P >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >
