That my friend would be the Astrological Zodiac sign Uranus ! Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet & Telecom 7266 SW 48 Street Miami, FL 33155 Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Christopher Tyler" <ch...@totalhighspeed.net> > To: af@afmug.com > Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 1:56:38 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we? > What's the astrological sign for a**hole? > (written in good humor of course) > > -- > Christopher Tyler > MTCRE/MTCNA/MTCTCE/MTCWE > Total Highspeed Internet Services > 417.851.1107 > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: ch...@wbmfg.com > To: af@afmug.com > Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 12:47:13 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we? > > It has to look like a hot chick, that’s all I’m sayin’ about that.... > > From: Bill Prince > Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 11:35 AM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we? > > I've also heard tell that Geminis are bisexual. > > > > bp > <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > > On 1/23/2017 10:30 AM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote: > > From Wikipedia... > > > I think it is fairly accurate ! > > > :) > > > > --------------------------------------- > > Astrologers believe Geminis have a volatile temperament, that their strength > however is their versatility, and that their versatility allows them to > learn a > little about everything and develop skills in many areas. Geminis are > considered to hold mysteriously unique artistic and creative abilities unlike > other signs. Often considered to be very intelligent individuals, they have a > wide appreciation for the arts, philosophy, history and the natural sciences. > They do not like boring people or routine procedures and therefore struggle > to > deal with authoritative figures. They are enlightened to talk about any > subject > which they find interesting and where they can stimulate their naturally > intellectual personalities. Geminis are noted to be drastic and hasty yet > very > responsible and disciplined. They are considered to be the most misunderstood > of all signs due to their dual personality expressed by the twins of their > sign. Because of this, don't be surprised to often find Geminis in different > moods and therefore mood swings can occur often for Geminis because of their > high degree of mental processing and thinking. This makes them quite > philosophical people. Geminis are sensitive as well but use their high > intelligence to counter anything that upsets them > ========================================== > > > Faisal Imtiaz > Snappy Internet & Telecom > 7266 SW 48 Street > Miami, FL 33155 > Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 > > Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > From: ch...@wbmfg.com > To: af@afmug.com > Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 1:18:16 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we? > > Well.... June 21 > Perhaps.... > > From: Faisal Imtiaz > > Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 10:47 AM > To: af@afmug.com > > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we? > > >Sometimes when I am trolling, I touch a nerve. I can switch to either > side of > >an argument at will for fun. > > > Are you a Gemini by any chance ? > > > > Faisal Imtiaz > Snappy Internet & Telecom > 7266 SW 48 Street > Miami, FL 33155 > Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 > > Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > From: ch...@wbmfg.com > To: af@afmug.com > Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 12:14:54 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we? > > I don’t think anyone has ever been knocked off the list. Shouted down > at times. > Insulted. But never knocked off. > > Sometimes when I am trolling, I touch a nerve. I can switch to either > side of > an argument at will for fun. > > With the exception of being a Clinton supporter. Just cannot make > myself go > there. > > From: That One Guy /sarcasm > > Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2017 7:47 PM > To: af@afmug.com > > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we? > > just fyi if jaime gets knocked off the list, im taking my toys and going > home > > in 4 years hes going to be showing us pictures of tecate and some > insanely tasty > looking crow anyway :-) > > > On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Jaime Solorza > <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I don't buy that... Respect your opinion but I don't buy that 63 > list... > > I have no confidence in Trump... I think he is bad for our country... > I will > not change my mind. If you want to knock me off list... It's cool... > I have > always remained true to my beliefs. My last post on this one... > > On Jan 22, 2017 3:50 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote: > > Have you ever looked at the list of people killed who were involved > in some way > with the JFK assassination? > > On Jan 22, 2017 4:34 PM, "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > > One thing is for certain, absolute inarguable fact, these 63 > people are as dead > as you can get and all of them either spilled the beans on the > Clintons or had > information that could harm the Clintons. > > So, if you want to talk ethics and morals of Trump, I have not yet > heard of > anyone he had whacked. Maybe he is just better at doing it. > 1.. Susan Coleman: > 2.. Larry Guerrin: > 3.. Kevin Ives > 4.. Don Henry: > 5.. Keith Coney: > 6.. Keith McKaskle: > 7.. Gregory Collins: > 8.. Jeff Rhodes: > 9.. James Milam: > 10.. Richard Winters: > 11.. Jordan Kettleson: > 12.. Alan Standorf: > 13.. Dennis Eisman: . > 14.. Danny Casalaro: > 15.. Victor Raiser: > 16.. R. Montgomery Raiser: > 17.. Paul Tully: > 18.. Ian Spiro: > 19.. Paula Gober: > 20.. Jim Wilhite: > 21.. Steve Willis, > 22.. Robert Williams, > 23.. Todd McKeahan > 24.. Conway LeBleu: > 25.. Sgt. Brian Haney, > 26.. Sgt. Tim Sabel, > 27.. Maj. William Barkley, > 28.. Capt. Scott Reynolds: > 29.. John Crawford: > 30.. John Wilson: > 31.. Paul Wilcher: > 32.. Vincent Foster: > 33.. Jon Parnell Walker: > 34.. Stanley Heard > 35.. Steven Dickson: > 36.. Jerry Luther Parks: > 37.. Ed Willey: > 38.. Gandy Baugh: > 39.. Herschell Friday: > 40.. Ronald Rogers: > 41.. Kathy Furguson: > 42.. Bill Shelton: > 43.. Stanley Huggins: > 44.. Paul Olson: > 45.. Calvin Walraven: > 46.. Alan G. Whicher: > 47.. Duane Garrett: > 48.. Ron Brown:. > 49.. Charles Meissner: > 50.. William Colby: > 51.. Admiral Jeremy Boorda: > 52.. Lance Herndon: > 53.. Neil Moody: > 54.. Barbara Wise: > 55.. Doug Adams: > 56.. Mary C. Mahoney: > 57.. Ronald Miller: > 58.. Sandy Hume: > 59.. Jim McDougal: > 60.. Johnny Lawhon: > 61.. Charles Wilbourne Miller: > 62.. Carlos Ghigliotti: > 63.. Tony Moser: > > From: Josh Reynolds > Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2017 2:41 PM > To: af@afmug.com > > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we? > > He also ran a lot of less than ethical schemes to make his money. > Some were > legal, some were not. You may consider that smart, and that's your > right. I do > not. > > On Jan 22, 2017 2:53 PM, "Jon Langeler" > <jon-ispli...@michwave.net> wrote: > > He had money, knew to hire the right people, and made good > decisions. > Historically that's not been common in politics. It's always been > mostly > 'spenders' > > > Jon Langeler > Michwave Technologies, Inc. > > > On Jan 22, 2017, at 3:20 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> > wrote: > > > Net worth is in no way an indicator of intelligence. In fact, it > often happens > by accident, or in spite of intelligence. > > On Jan 22, 2017 2:00 PM, "Jon Langeler" > <jon-ispli...@michwave.net> wrote: > > Considering his net worth he might he smarter than any of us. But > if your > looking for miracles you might be better off reading the bible. > > > Jon Langeler > Michwave Technologies, Inc. > > > On Jan 22, 2017, at 2:55 PM, Jaime Solorza > <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Empty promises just like his brain. But it's okay to grope > now.... Waiting > for right time to do it comrades > > On Jan 22, 2017 10:38 AM, "Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com> > wrote: > > https://streamable.com/md28v > > > I still cannot settle down with the idea that a Trump presidency > is not some > kind of joke taken too far... > > On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Jaime Solorza > <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Waiting on Tweets Trump or Trumps Tweet response to this.. > > https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fm.huffpost.com%2Fus%2Fentry%2Fus_5884a06be4b096b4a2325818%2Famp#pt0-568751 > > > On Jan 22, 2017 7:40 AM, "Jaime Solorza" > <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hey but you can buy Melanias jewelry line on new white house > website. The > bullshit is going to get worse...no million and half attended > inauguration.... > Women's March had a lot more... His ego is bruised. Let me > Trumpspeak... So > sad. > > On Jan 22, 2017 12:47 AM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" > <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > there is this gem now > http://www.hewillnotdivide.us/ > > 24x7 real time stream of people being idiots ala transformers guy > > On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Stefan Englhardt > <s...@genias.net> wrote: > > > Today we’ve great possibilities to spread news. But it is very > difficult to get > the real information unbiased. Breitbart is known to be very > biased even here > over the ocean. But it seems the „normal“ media in USA is biased, > too. > > E.g. we never understood how Bush jun. got his second election > where it was > clear he started a war based on wrong information. This is > unthinkable here. It > would be the one point which would dominate the discussion and > would make him > unvotable here. Your media seemed to move the discussion away from > this fact > and relativated his guilty to make him votable. > > Another example is the Hillary Email discussion. This is a topic > which is minor > at best but was discussed the whole time. > > I guess it is possible Trump kills a person in TV and get > reelected if media > helps him. Unthinkable? But killing one person is much less a > problem than > starting a war where thousands are killed. Breitbart would find > 100 reasons why > this person has to die and would find other topics to report. > > > > > > Good and neutral media are the base of a working democracy. For > sure you have a > problem. > > > > > > > > > > Von: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] Im Auftrag von That One Guy > /sarcasm > Gesendet: Sonntag, 22. Januar 2017 07:05 > An: af@afmug.com > > Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we? > > > > > > > > Im pretty confident the next few days is setting the stage to > effectively > shutting down "media access". Im all for it in the current > environment. Between > press releases, Publicly accessible data, FOIA responses, live > streamed events, > and one on one interviews (and yes...twitter) the press really is > the dialup > internet method of getting information. We know more in real time > then the > press could ever package up and present. The current mindset of > media in press > conferences is that of militants (both sides of the media isle) > and there is > zero professionalism from either one. Neither really gives a damn > what the > answer is anyway, theyre going to report whatever their > preconceived response > was either way. > > > > > > > > Question: Did we send B52 Bombers to hit an ISIS target? > > > > > > > > Answer: Yes > > > > > > > > CNN under Obama: Obama authorizes successful airstrike removing > 100 ISIS > fighters in final days of his presidency. This act ensures that > those who would > commit terror will be addressed accordingly, even during the > transition of > power. > > > > > > > > Breitbart under Obama: Obama, the snake furthers military conflict > day before > leaving office, leaving all Americans at risk during a tumultuous > time of > transition. Kills 100, ensuring a retaliatory response. > > > > > > > > Had the same attack been authorized today: > > > > > > > > CNN under Trump: MILITARY FIASCO: Trump bombs random targets. Top > military > officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, refuse to verify > there were no > civilian casualties, at least 100 confirmed dead. War crime > charges possible? > > > > > > > > Breitbart under Trump: God Emperor Trump authorized the removal > of 100 ISIS top > leaders in his first act as Commander in Chief. Rumors of ISIS > surrender. > Barack Obama potentially one of the dead operatives. > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 11:45 PM, Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > I'm all for it. I think that everyone is probably just impressed > by the first > white house press briefing and the remarks at Langley. What an > amazing public > speaker this one is. Have you ever had a friend or friend's uncle > or something > who did too much meth? You know how they start out with one > sentence and then > before you know it they have told fifteen other stories before > they ever get to > the point...if they ever do??? We have four years of that to look > forward to. > Just watch the full speech at the CIA, you will see what I mean. > Or > don't....save yourself the pain. > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Josh Reynolds > <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote: > > > > Can we talk about politics yet? :P > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see > your team as part > of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > > > > -- > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see > your team as part > of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part > of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.