What's the astrological sign for a**hole?
(written in good humor of course)
--
Christopher Tyler
MTCRE/MTCNA/MTCTCE/MTCWE
Total Highspeed Internet Services
417.851.1107
----- Original Message -----
From: ch...@wbmfg.com
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 12:47:13 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we?
It has to look like a hot chick, that’s all I’m sayin’ about that....
From: Bill Prince
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 11:35 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we?
I've also heard tell that Geminis are bisexual.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 1/23/2017 10:30 AM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
From Wikipedia...
I think it is fairly accurate !
:)
---------------------------------------
Astrologers believe Geminis have a volatile temperament, that their strength
however is their versatility, and that their versatility allows them to learn a
little about everything and develop skills in many areas. Geminis are
considered to hold mysteriously unique artistic and creative abilities unlike
other signs. Often considered to be very intelligent individuals, they have a
wide appreciation for the arts, philosophy, history and the natural sciences.
They do not like boring people or routine procedures and therefore struggle to
deal with authoritative figures. They are enlightened to talk about any subject
which they find interesting and where they can stimulate their naturally
intellectual personalities. Geminis are noted to be drastic and hasty yet very
responsible and disciplined. They are considered to be the most misunderstood
of all signs due to their dual personality expressed by the twins of their
sign. Because of this, don't be surprised to often find Geminis in different
moods and therefore mood swings can occur often for Geminis because of their
high degree of mental processing and thinking. This makes them quite
philosophical people. Geminis are sensitive as well but use their high
intelligence to counter anything that upsets them
==========================================
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: ch...@wbmfg.com
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 1:18:16 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we?
Well.... June 21
Perhaps....
From: Faisal Imtiaz
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 10:47 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we?
>Sometimes when I am trolling, I touch a nerve. I can switch to either
side of an argument at will for fun.
Are you a Gemini by any chance ?
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: ch...@wbmfg.com
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 12:14:54 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we?
I don’t think anyone has ever been knocked off the list. Shouted down at
times. Insulted. But never knocked off.
Sometimes when I am trolling, I touch a nerve. I can switch to either
side of an argument at will for fun.
With the exception of being a Clinton supporter. Just cannot make myself
go there.
From: That One Guy /sarcasm
Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2017 7:47 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we?
just fyi if jaime gets knocked off the list, im taking my toys and going
home
in 4 years hes going to be showing us pictures of tecate and some
insanely tasty looking crow anyway :-)
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Jaime Solorza
<losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote:
I don't buy that... Respect your opinion but I don't buy that 63
list...
I have no confidence in Trump... I think he is bad for our country...
I will not change my mind. If you want to knock me off list... It's cool... I
have always remained true to my beliefs. My last post on this one...
On Jan 22, 2017 3:50 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote:
Have you ever looked at the list of people killed who were involved
in some way with the JFK assassination?
On Jan 22, 2017 4:34 PM, "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
One thing is for certain, absolute inarguable fact, these 63 people
are as dead as you can get and all of them either spilled the beans on the
Clintons or had information that could harm the Clintons.
So, if you want to talk ethics and morals of Trump, I have not yet
heard of anyone he had whacked. Maybe he is just better at doing it.
1.. Susan Coleman:
2.. Larry Guerrin:
3.. Kevin Ives
4.. Don Henry:
5.. Keith Coney:
6.. Keith McKaskle:
7.. Gregory Collins:
8.. Jeff Rhodes:
9.. James Milam:
10.. Richard Winters:
11.. Jordan Kettleson:
12.. Alan Standorf:
13.. Dennis Eisman: .
14.. Danny Casalaro:
15.. Victor Raiser:
16.. R. Montgomery Raiser:
17.. Paul Tully:
18.. Ian Spiro:
19.. Paula Gober:
20.. Jim Wilhite:
21.. Steve Willis,
22.. Robert Williams,
23.. Todd McKeahan
24.. Conway LeBleu:
25.. Sgt. Brian Haney,
26.. Sgt. Tim Sabel,
27.. Maj. William Barkley,
28.. Capt. Scott Reynolds:
29.. John Crawford:
30.. John Wilson:
31.. Paul Wilcher:
32.. Vincent Foster:
33.. Jon Parnell Walker:
34.. Stanley Heard
35.. Steven Dickson:
36.. Jerry Luther Parks:
37.. Ed Willey:
38.. Gandy Baugh:
39.. Herschell Friday:
40.. Ronald Rogers:
41.. Kathy Furguson:
42.. Bill Shelton:
43.. Stanley Huggins:
44.. Paul Olson:
45.. Calvin Walraven:
46.. Alan G. Whicher:
47.. Duane Garrett:
48.. Ron Brown:.
49.. Charles Meissner:
50.. William Colby:
51.. Admiral Jeremy Boorda:
52.. Lance Herndon:
53.. Neil Moody:
54.. Barbara Wise:
55.. Doug Adams:
56.. Mary C. Mahoney:
57.. Ronald Miller:
58.. Sandy Hume:
59.. Jim McDougal:
60.. Johnny Lawhon:
61.. Charles Wilbourne Miller:
62.. Carlos Ghigliotti:
63.. Tony Moser:
From: Josh Reynolds
Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2017 2:41 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we?
He also ran a lot of less than ethical schemes to make his money.
Some were legal, some were not. You may consider that smart, and that's your
right. I do not.
On Jan 22, 2017 2:53 PM, "Jon Langeler" <jon-ispli...@michwave.net>
wrote:
He had money, knew to hire the right people, and made good
decisions. Historically that's not been common in politics. It's always been
mostly 'spenders'
Jon Langeler
Michwave Technologies, Inc.
On Jan 22, 2017, at 3:20 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com>
wrote:
Net worth is in no way an indicator of intelligence. In fact, it
often happens by accident, or in spite of intelligence.
On Jan 22, 2017 2:00 PM, "Jon Langeler" <jon-ispli...@michwave.net>
wrote:
Considering his net worth he might he smarter than any of us. But
if your looking for miracles you might be better off reading the bible.
Jon Langeler
Michwave Technologies, Inc.
On Jan 22, 2017, at 2:55 PM, Jaime Solorza
<losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote:
Empty promises just like his brain. But it's okay to grope
now.... Waiting for right time to do it comrades
On Jan 22, 2017 10:38 AM, "Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com>
wrote:
https://streamable.com/md28v
I still cannot settle down with the idea that a Trump presidency is
not some kind of joke taken too far...
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Jaime Solorza
<losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote:
Waiting on Tweets Trump or Trumps Tweet response to this..
https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fm.huffpost.com%2Fus%2Fentry%2Fus_5884a06be4b096b4a2325818%2Famp#pt0-568751
On Jan 22, 2017 7:40 AM, "Jaime Solorza"
<losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hey but you can buy Melanias jewelry line on new white house
website. The bullshit is going to get worse...no million and half attended
inauguration.... Women's March had a lot more... His ego is bruised. Let me
Trumpspeak... So sad.
On Jan 22, 2017 12:47 AM, "That One Guy /sarcasm"
<thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
there is this gem now
http://www.hewillnotdivide.us/
24x7 real time stream of people being idiots ala transformers guy
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Stefan Englhardt <s...@genias.net>
wrote:
Today we’ve great possibilities to spread news. But it is very
difficult to get the real information unbiased. Breitbart is known to be very
biased even here over the ocean. But it seems the „normal“ media in USA is
biased, too.
E.g. we never understood how Bush jun. got his second election
where it was clear he started a war based on wrong information. This is
unthinkable here. It would be the one point which would dominate the discussion
and would make him unvotable here. Your media seemed to move the discussion
away from this fact and relativated his guilty to make him votable.
Another example is the Hillary Email discussion. This is a topic
which is minor at best but was discussed the whole time.
I guess it is possible Trump kills a person in TV and get reelected
if media helps him. Unthinkable? But killing one person is much less a problem
than starting a war where thousands are killed. Breitbart would find 100
reasons why this person has to die and would find other topics to report.
Good and neutral media are the base of a working democracy. For
sure you have a problem.
Von: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] Im Auftrag von That One Guy
/sarcasm
Gesendet: Sonntag, 22. Januar 2017 07:05
An: af@afmug.com
Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we?
Im pretty confident the next few days is setting the stage to
effectively shutting down "media access". Im all for it in the current
environment. Between press releases, Publicly accessible data, FOIA responses,
live streamed events, and one on one interviews (and yes...twitter) the press
really is the dialup internet method of getting information. We know more in
real time then the press could ever package up and present. The current mindset
of media in press conferences is that of militants (both sides of the media
isle) and there is zero professionalism from either one. Neither really gives a
damn what the answer is anyway, theyre going to report whatever their
preconceived response was either way.
Question: Did we send B52 Bombers to hit an ISIS target?
Answer: Yes
CNN under Obama: Obama authorizes successful airstrike removing 100
ISIS fighters in final days of his presidency. This act ensures that those who
would commit terror will be addressed accordingly, even during the transition
of power.
Breitbart under Obama: Obama, the snake furthers military conflict
day before leaving office, leaving all Americans at risk during a tumultuous
time of transition. Kills 100, ensuring a retaliatory response.
Had the same attack been authorized today:
CNN under Trump: MILITARY FIASCO: Trump bombs random targets. Top
military officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, refuse to verify there
were no civilian casualties, at least 100 confirmed dead. War crime charges
possible?
Breitbart under Trump: God Emperor Trump authorized the removal of
100 ISIS top leaders in his first act as Commander in Chief. Rumors of ISIS
surrender. Barack Obama potentially one of the dead operatives.
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 11:45 PM, Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
I'm all for it. I think that everyone is probably just impressed
by the first white house press briefing and the remarks at Langley. What an
amazing public speaker this one is. Have you ever had a friend or friend's
uncle or something who did too much meth? You know how they start out with one
sentence and then before you know it they have told fifteen other stories
before they ever get to the point...if they ever do??? We have four years of
that to look forward to. Just watch the full speech at the CIA, you will see
what I mean. Or don't....save yourself the pain.
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Josh Reynolds
<j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote:
Can we talk about politics yet? :P
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your
team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your
team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
