They claim to be residential friendly now, but I don't know what that actually
turns into.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gino Villarini" <g...@aeronetpr.com>
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 7:20:45 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] radwin jet vs 450m
Being atheros based, its difficult to grasp how they cant produce a low cost
residential sub unit… they could even OEM it to other vendor and run Radwin
code on it …
When we tested the platform, you could not oversubscribe the AP capacity. I
believe that changed …
From: Af < af-boun...@afmug.com > on behalf of Stefan Englhardt <
s...@genias.net >
Reply-To: " af@afmug.com " < af@afmug.com >
Date: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 at 9:14 AM
To: " af@afmug.com " < af@afmug.com >
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] radwin jet vs 450m
We used Radwin 5000 (without jet). It is a high quality wifi-based solution.
Hardware is very rugged and software quality is better than
mikrotik/ubnt/cambium. RF-wise they are limited to what the atheros-chipset
does. So no magic there but very predictable stable performance. The interface
was good but uncommon. As I have seen they move toward normal web based
interface.
They do local sync and gps sync.
Problem is the pricing and availability. Pricing did not allow to use them for
residential.
We got them direct from israel. They were late with .ac based stuff (as epmp
is, still).
Gino Villarini
President
Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968
Von: Af [ mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com ] Im Auftrag von Mike Hammett
Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. Januar 2017 13:41
An: af@afmug.com
Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] radwin jet vs 450m
Surely your interference levels are better than mine in the suburban portion of
my network.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Novak" < jno...@lrcomm.com >
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 12:10:59 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] radwin jet vs 450m
750mbit w/ 80mhz channels per
http://www.radwin.com/contentManagment/uploadedFiles/Brochures/RW5000-Web-Brochure.pdf
I've read of other operators considering Radwin for business to business sales.
I've been meaning to look deeper into it but have not yet. I won't be able to
use 80mhz channels anywhere I need capacity.
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Dev < d...@logicalwebhost.com > wrote:
I read that the Radwin Jet PtMP AP does 750Mbit aggregate and has beam
steering, subs look stupid expensive (if I’m looking at the right units),
anyone know the performance/other comparison between that and the Cambium 450m?
They both look pretty tasty…which would you deploy and why?
