Yes. Oversubsription is possible. There pricing is with business customers in mind. CPEs are rugged. So they should have made a low cost less rugged cpe.
Von: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] Im Auftrag von Gino Villarini Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. Januar 2017 14:21 An: af@afmug.com Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] radwin jet vs 450m Being atheros based, its difficult to grasp how they cant produce a low cost residential sub unit... they could even OEM it to other vendor and run Radwin code on it... When we tested the platform, you could not oversubscribe the AP capacity. I believe that changed... From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com> > on behalf of Stefan Englhardt <s...@genias.net <mailto:s...@genias.net> > Reply-To: "af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> " <af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> > Date: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 at 9:14 AM To: "af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> " <af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] radwin jet vs 450m We used Radwin 5000 (without jet). It is a high quality wifi-based solution. Hardware is very rugged and software quality is better than mikrotik/ubnt/cambium. RF-wise they are limited to what the atheros-chipset does. So no magic there but very predictable stable performance. The interface was good but uncommon. As I have seen they move toward normal web based interface. They do local sync and gps sync. Problem is the pricing and availability. Pricing did not allow to use them for residential. We got them direct from israel. They were late with .ac based stuff (as epmp is, still). Gino Villarini President Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968 Von: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] Im Auftrag von Mike Hammett Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. Januar 2017 13:41 An: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] radwin jet vs 450m Surely your interference levels are better than mine in the suburban portion of my network. ----- Mike Hammett <http://www.ics-il.com/> Intelligent Computing Solutions <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> Midwest Internet Exchange <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> The Brothers WISP <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> _____ From: "Joe Novak" <jno...@lrcomm.com <mailto:jno...@lrcomm.com> > To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 12:10:59 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] radwin jet vs 450m 750mbit w/ 80mhz channels per http://www.radwin.com/contentManagment/uploadedFiles/Brochures/RW5000-Web-Brochure.pdf I've read of other operators considering Radwin for business to business sales. I've been meaning to look deeper into it but have not yet. I won't be able to use 80mhz channels anywhere I need capacity. On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Dev <d...@logicalwebhost.com <mailto:d...@logicalwebhost.com> > wrote: I read that the Radwin Jet PtMP AP does 750Mbit aggregate and has beam steering, subs look stupid expensive (if I'm looking at the right units), anyone know the performance/other comparison between that and the Cambium 450m? They both look pretty tasty...which would you deploy and why?
