Well, I can see paying premium for radios.. After all, they work good, and make us lots of money.. They are well-engineered and tested for the most part. The CMM5 controller is a hobby-grade piece of untested off-the-shelf crap, and does not justify the price tag.

Vlad

On 2/17/2017 4:02 PM, Keefe John wrote:

So they're charging $995.00 for something that likely cost them < $50. Now you know their profit margins on radios and other hardware.

Keefe


On 2/17/2017 3:28 PM, Vlad Sedov wrote:
Awesome! Can't wait. We have a bunch of these Medusas going up in the near future..


Vlad


On 2/17/2017 3:17 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote:
So this looks like as good of a place as any to provide this tidbit:

I finally found the component I was looking for to complete the cambium sync design here, and I now have a breadboarded solution to sync Medusa (and 450i) via 'cambium sync) here. Seems to be working. I'm in the process of getting the design on a prototype board for the rackmount injector. This *is* going to be more expensive than the non-cambium sync version, but for roughly the price of just that controller, you should be able to get the rackmount chassis+controller plus either 8 of injection, and a syncbox GPS receiver. For probably around $1200 or so, you should be able to get a fully loaded one with 16 ports of sync.

I'm *not* holding this injector for this for reasons I described in earlier threads, but add a month or two after WISPAMERICA and this should be shipping.

-forrest



On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Vlad Sedov <v...@atlasok.com <mailto:v...@atlasok.com>> wrote:

    The only reason we got this is to properly sync our Medusa APs
    from the base of the tower, and maintain a clean gigabit
    ethernet link.
    If Forrest had a product that did the same thing, we would be
    all over it. Literally every other piece of GPS sync hardware we
    use is from PacketFlux.


    Vlad


    On 2/17/2017 11:09 AM, Mathew Howard wrote:
    You could also buy all the parts to do the same thing with
    PacketFlux gear for a whole lot less than $800... I don't think
    the actual cost of building the hardware has much to do with
    the price of a CMM

    On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 10:55 AM, Adam Moffett
    <dmmoff...@gmail.com <mailto:dmmoff...@gmail.com>> wrote:

        You couldn't write the software for it for $100.

        Are you looking at a prototype or a finished product? Link?



        ------ Original Message ------
        From: "Vlad Sedov" <v...@atlasok.com <mailto:v...@atlasok.com>>
        To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
        Sent: 2/17/2017 11:53:31 AM
        Subject: Re: [AFMUG] CMM5 controller.. Are you serious,
        Cambium?

            No doubt, but for $800, I would expect something a bit
            more um.. rugged. I can build this for about $100.


            Vlad

            On 2/17/2017 10:36 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:

                Just like you, they're in business to make money.


                ------ Original Message ------
                From: "Vlad Sedov" <v...@atlasok.com
                <mailto:v...@atlasok.com>>
                To: "af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>"
                <af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>>
                Sent: 2/17/2017 10:31:01 AM
                Subject: [AFMUG] CMM5 controller.. Are you serious,
                Cambium?

                    $700-900 for a $35 Raspberry Pi controller, a
                    DC-DC regulator, and a metal box?
                    Looks like OpenWRT-type Linux distro with LuCI
                    web interface, and a module to control the CMM5.

                    Seems a bit steep, no?


                    peace

                    Vlad









--
*Forrest Christian* /CEO//, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc./
Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
forre...@imach.com <mailto:forre...@imach.com> | http://www.packetflux.com <http://www.packetflux.com/> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian> <http://facebook.com/packetflux> <http://twitter.com/@packetflux>





Reply via email to